Re: [racket-users] note about info.rkt in package conflicts docs?

2016-09-20 Thread Matthew Flatt
Yes, the documentation should be revised to exclude "info.rkt" as a source of conflicts. At Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:29:52 -0400, "'John Clements' via Racket Users" wrote: > I’m separating a package into -lib and -test packages for the first time, and > I’m wondering about the collection-level

[racket-users] note about info.rkt in package conflicts docs?

2016-09-19 Thread 'John Clements' via Racket Users
I’m separating a package into -lib and -test packages for the first time, and I’m wondering about the collection-level package files. Specifically, suppose that the packages foo-lib and foo-test both contribute files to the foo collection. Can each package contain its own foo/info.rkt file?