A PR to improve `struct->vector` for CS would be welcome. There
relevant code is here:
https://github.com/racket/racket/blob/master/racket/src/cs/rumble/struct.ss#L1221
As you'll see, the synthesized name is currently whatever comes out of
Chez Scheme's `inspect/object` interface. It could
We may change Racket CS so that it produces the same results, but in
general the results of `struct->vector` on values that are opaque is
not something that should be relied on.
The describe library is, I believe, unmaintained, and hasn't been
updated in many years.
Sam
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at
> On Sep 15, 2020, at 3:11 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> This is a difference in behavior between Racket BC and Racket CS, and
> not something in the describe library:
>
> [samth@homer:~/work/teaching/c211 (master) racket-7.8] racket
> Welcome to Racket v7.8.
>> (struct->vector 5)
>
This is a difference in behavior between Racket BC and Racket CS, and
not something in the describe library:
[samth@homer:~/work/teaching/c211 (master) racket-7.8] racket
Welcome to Racket v7.8.
> (struct->vector 5)
'#(struct:fixnum-integer ...)
> ^D
[samth@homer:~/work/teaching/c211 (master)
4 matches
Mail list logo
