Am So., 1. Sept. 2019 um 22:55 Uhr schrieb Neil Van Dyke <
n...@neilvandyke.org>:
> Simon Schlee wrote on 9/1/19 3:28 PM:
> >
> > Try not to make identifiers be simple generic terms, like `watch`
> >
> >
> > I strongly disagree with this statement.
>
> I think what you say is valid, and I
Simon Schlee wrote on 9/1/19 3:28 PM:
Try not to make identifiers be simple generic terms, like `watch`
I strongly disagree with this statement.
I think what you say is valid, and I agree in some situations.
However, we're talking about reusable third-party packages, which are
used
>
> Try not to make identifiers be simple generic terms, like `watch`
>
I strongly disagree with this statement.
Rackets require possibilities are highly flexible so if you want more
specific names use prefix-in and prefix the module name or whatever you
like.
The way racket does imports is
Thanks for the clarification, Neil! Your feedback does help a great deal. I'll
also be happy to share updates with a respectful frequency now that I see the
other replies. :)
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 1:04 PM, Hendrik Boom
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31,
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 02:45:02PM +, Sage Gerard wrote:
> I looked back and found my mistake: I only asked about blog posts and videos.
> I'll refrain from version update posts here from now on.
Whatever you originally asked for, I think this ensuing discussion about
third-party packages
Sage Gerard wrote on 8/31/19 10:38 AM:
You probably don't want to be slowing yourself down with offering people
previews of new versions, lead times for input, etc.
I'm unknown in open source so
I think all of us in Racket land are pretty much unknown in open source
(outside of
I looked back and found my mistake: I only asked about blog posts and videos.
I'll refrain from version update posts here from now on.
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 10:38 AM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Hi Neil, and thanks for the helpful information and
7 matches
Mail list logo
