Regarding the discussion of tests expected to fail, and moving
expected-fail tests to different directories, I wonder whether you'd
prefer using an expected-fail annotation per test case.
An annotation seems useful for my own work, and lightweight, but I don't
know about core Racket (especially with the couple decades of legacy
tests done various ways).
https://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/overeasy/#%28part._.Expected_.Failures%29
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/a16626c5-72c5-17ea-fdee-b84583cd6d0e%40neilvandyke.org.
