Ryan, I just tested your pull request, and… it doesn’t make much difference in
my example.
One important thing that I realize that I *totally neglected* to mention is
that I’m running CS racket here, not BC. Based on my experiments, it appears
that
1) CS is much faster than BC for both
Neil Van Dyke writes:
> I think anyone using XML or HTML seriously with Racket should probably at
> least
> be told of the SXML family of tools. And warned about the compatibility
> problems.
>
> Though not tell them *everywhere* XML in the docs. For example, I
> figure a
> tutorial for
I think anyone using XML or HTML seriously with Racket should probably
at least be told of the SXML family of tools. And warned about the
compatibility problems.
Though not tell them *everywhere* XML in the docs. For example, I
figure a tutorial for Racket Web Server shouldn't distract
3 matches
Mail list logo
