Re: [racket-users] racket-mode: OK to require Racket 6.0+?

2016-10-11 Thread Konrad Hinsen
On 10/10/16 21:42, Tim Jervis wrote: Here here! +1 Tim Jervis +44 7801 337 078 On 10 Oct 2016, at 19:56, Dmitry Igrishin wrote: Hi Greg, Yes, please! Racket mode for Emacs is great. Thank you for you work! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [racket-users] racket-mode: OK to require Racket 6.0+?

2016-10-10 Thread Tim Jervis
Here here! Tim Jervis +44 7801 337 078 > On 10 Oct 2016, at 19:56, Dmitry Igrishin wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > Yes, please! Racket mode for Emacs is great. Thank you for you work! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket

Re: [racket-users] racket-mode: OK to require Racket 6.0+?

2016-10-10 Thread Dmitry Igrishin
Hi Greg, Yes, please! Racket mode for Emacs is great. Thank you for you work! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [racket-users] racket-mode: OK to require Racket 6.0+?

2016-10-10 Thread Daniel Bastos
I use it. I really like it. Go ahead! (And thank you!) On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Greg Hendershott wrote: > This is a heads-up that I want to update racket-mode for Emacs to > require Racket 6.0 or newer. [...] -- You received this message because you are