Re: [Radiance-dev] how serious are these remaining 5 build errors?

> Cannot find wish executable in current path -- trad not installed. > https://gist.github.com/philipjss/bded331695eedfad0e76f48557b21427#file-build-1-console-output-txt-L802-L803 > > >

Re: [Radiance-dev] specifying X11 location

> should I be concerned about the fact that installing libX11 and libX11-devel > seems to have been sufficient in order to eliminate the X11-related > compilation errors? No. There’s probably a symlink that’s covering that. > Also, our application uses Radiance in headless mode (no UI). > Am

Re: [Radiance-dev] src/rt/Version.c does not compile

@Greg >this is what your Version.c file should look like in the end That works. Great. Thanks. Philip On 5 April 2018 at 16:46, Gregory J. Ward wrote: > Incidentally, this is what your Version.c file should look like in the > end. If you create this in your src/rt

Re: [Radiance-dev] src/rt/Version.c does not compile

by the way, someone has run into this problem in the past: https://github.com/NREL/Radiance/issues/17 Philip On 5 April 2018 at 16:34, Philip Schwarz < philip.johann.schw...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > when I run 'makeall install' against release 5.0 of Radiance ( >

Re: [Radiance-dev] src/rt/Version.c does not compile

It seems like your Linux (and some others?) don't include the standard "ed" editor or any equivalent. Can you install it? This script could probably be converted easily enough to 'sed' or Perl, but this is the first I've heard of the problem. Reporting errors on NREL's github is currently

[Radiance-dev] src/rt/Version.c does not compile

Hello, when I run 'makeall install' against release 5.0 of Radiance ( https://github.com/NREL/Radiance/releases/tag/5.0), file src/rt/Version.c is automatically generated, with the following contents: RADIANCE 5.0 Thu Apr 5 13:38:59 UTC 2018 root 6f0749328ec2 Version.c does not compile. It

Re: [Radiance-dev] src/rt/Version.c does not compile

Hello Greg, Yes, about ed, I was getting the following error: gcc -I../common -L../lib -O2 -Dlinux -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -I/usr/include/X11 -DNOSTEREO -c -o pmaptype.o pmaptype.c ( cat VERSION ; date ; whoami ; hostname ) > Version.c ed - Version.c < verscript.ed /bin/sh: ed:

Re: [Radiance-dev] src/rt/Version.c does not compile

Yes, thanks for supplying the stdout. Greg is right, you need 'ed' as the script is written, easy to sub for some other stream editor. And I am starting to monitor the GitHub issues page more regularly, as people do seem to be using it, but as I and Greg have noted here and elsewhere Philip,

[Radiance-dev] how serious are these remaining 5 build errors?

Hello, now that I no longer get X11-related compilation errors, I am down to the following 5: make clean error https://gist.github.com/philipjss/bded331695eedfad0e76f48557b21427#file-build-1-console-output-txt-L121-L126 Lib tiff error

Re: [Radiance-dev] how serious are these remaining 5 build errors?

Hi Philip, you may also want to install a current version of libtiff-dev. This is used for the tif image format conversion (ra_tiff and friends). This would all better go to the Radiance discussion rather the development list - unless we aim at providing a list of external dependencies for

Re: [Radiance-dev] how serious are these remaining 5 build errors?

After installing "ed", you would need to remove the unedited Version.c file to recreate it with makeall. Regarding your other errors, you need to install the Radiance overlay (Auxiliary files) that includes the src/px/tiff directory (I think). The link was on the downloads page:

Re: [Radiance-dev] how serious are these remaining 5 build errors?

Hello Lars, are we saying installing libtiff-dev should address the following? cd ../libtiff ; make install /bin/sh: line 0: cd: tiff: No such file or directory /bin/sh: ./configure: No such file or directory /bin/sh: line 6: cd: port: No such file or directory make[1]: Entering directory

Re: [Radiance-dev] how serious are these remaining 5 build errors?

This is probably not worth talking about, but if you remove Version.c and run "rmake" in src/rt, you should see: $ rmake Version.c ( cat VERSION ; date ; whoami ; hostname ) > Version.c ed - Version.c < verscript.ed Thus, if a bad version of Version.c exists, ed won't get run and you'll get the

Re: [Radiance-dev] how serious are these remaining 5 build errors?

@Greg Yes, I can confirm that if I download the Radiance overlay (Auxiliary files) and take the src/px/tiff directory, and add it to the radiance 5.0 codebase that I am trying to build, the following errors go away: make clean error

[Radiance-dev] specifying X11 location

Hello, should I be concerned about the fact that installing libX11 and libX11-devel seems to have been sufficient in order to eliminate the X11-related compilation errors? I expected to also have to change the -L option to point to /usr/lib64 in the following set mach="-Dlinux