Thanks John!
Victor
On 4/29/10 2:18 PM, "john muhl" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Jim Gay wrote:
>
> On
> Apr 29, 2010, at 11:03 AM, john muhl wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:37
> AM, Victor Zuniga
>> wrote:
>>> One of our
> staff members encountered an interesting behavi
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Jim Gay wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:03 AM, john muhl wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Victor Zuniga
>> wrote:
>>> One of our staff members encountered an interesting behavior when setting up
>>> a form for a local activity. They wanted to limit
On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:03 AM, john muhl wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Victor Zuniga
> wrote:
>> One of our staff members encountered an interesting behavior when setting up
>> a form for a local activity. They wanted to limit the amount of characters a
>> user can type within the tex
Thanks John for pointing this out.
Best,
Victor
On 4/29/10 11:03 AM, "john muhl" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Victor
> Zuniga
wrote:
> One of our staff members
> encountered an interesting behavior when setting up
> a form for a local
> activity. They wanted to limit the amount
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Victor Zuniga
wrote:
> One of our staff members encountered an interesting behavior when setting up
> a form for a local activity. They wanted to limit the amount of characters a
> user can type within the text box. They went ahead and used the maxlength in
> the f
Hi there,
One of our staff members encountered an interesting behavior when setting up
a form for a local activity. They wanted to limit the amount of characters a
user can type within the text box. They went ahead and used the maxlength in
the following manner:
However, when looking at the ge
