Jay,
I think its a good idea to make things unambiguous but taggs just
feels wrong. Why not reuse "taglib" from J2EE? They're basically the
same thing as our tags
Sent from my iPhone
On 25-Oct-08, at 5:56 AM, Jay Levitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The term "tags" is, of necessity, overloaded in Radiant; we have
Radius tags, and we have radiant-tagging-extension "tagging as in
'2.0' and tagclouds" tags.
That makes it difficult to search for questions, blog posts, etc. on
either type of tag. But "tags" is the right word; it's what
everyone else uses, and making up a new term would be both futile
and confusing.
Why not refer to the radiant-tagging-extension tags as "taggs"? The
meaning is still clear, but it uniquifies the tagcloud meaning
(modulo the occasional misspelling).
Jay
PS - Yeah, I'm procrastinating; what's it to you?
PPS - I'm not sure if this suggestion would imply that the radiant-
tagging-extension should be renamed to radiant-taggging extension...
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
