I have to admit that rspec is still a bit intimidating, so I'm not
sure this is exactly the sort of spec you were looking for. Feel free
to point out everything that's wrong here and I'll try again.
===
--- standard_tags_spec.rb
+++ standard_tags_spec.rb
@@ -383,6 +383,13 @@
it 'r:random
On 6 Jun 2008, at 01:01, john muhl wrote:
I'd like to insert part of a random subpage into the sidebar and
figured it'd be a good fit for the r:random tag but so far am
having very little luck. I've tried:
r:random
r:children:each
r:optionr:title//r:option
/r:children:each
/r:random
This one has always been a mystery to me, however I believe it has to do
with tag blocks versus expands. I imagine, however, we could produce a
failing spec to demonstrate what is unexpected about the behavior. Any
takers?
Sean
john muhl wrote:
On 2008/06/07, at 16:49, Andrew Neil wrote:
Actually, I just answered my own question. We should really be
rendering the contents of r:option at each pass, rather than passing
the block back. The reason is that local context (tag.locals) will be
potentially lost when you render the block after selecting the option.
However, a spec
I guess Sunday is as good a day as any to get to know rspec. Unless
someone beats me to it I send a pull request when I think I have
something useful.
On 2008/06/07, at 20:35, Sean Cribbs wrote:
Actually, I just answered my own question. We should really be
rendering the contents of
I'd like to insert part of a random subpage into the sidebar and
figured it'd be a good fit for the r:random tag but so far am having
very little luck. I've tried:
r:random
r:children:each
r:optionr:title//r:option
/r:children:each
/r:random
and even:
r:random
r:find
