Re: [Radiant] 0.9 RC1 suitable for production use?
On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Charles Roper wrote: Great, thanks for the feedback, that's most helpful. A couple of further questions if it's not too much trouble: - Will upgrading from .8 to .9 be straightforward? That depends on what extensions you are using. The interface has changed quite a bit and some extensions may not have been updated. There are fallbacks which should ensure that everything works, however some extension might need some UI tweaks. We're going to be merging in the i18n branch shortly. - When you say 'soon' do you have a time-frame in mind or do you mean 'as soon as possible'? As soon as possible, but likely within a month or so. Cheers, Charles On 16 March 2010 14:51, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: I'd agree with that. But I do want to get 0.9 out soon. I want to squash as many of the issues on github as possible and merge in the i18n work. On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:45 AM, john muhl wrote: if you want to use 0.9 i'd recommend using the current master branch as the RC1 release is far, far behind the current work. personally i'm still starting new projects with 0.8.1 mostly because these are sites for clients and being profitable means i don't want to be tracking a moving target; not because 0.9 is unstable or anything. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Charles Roper reac...@charlesroper.co.uk wrote: I'm about to start a new Radiant site and was wondering whether I should go with 0.9RC1 or 0.8.1? In the opinion of the community, is RC1 stable enough for production use? ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
Re: [Radiant] 0.9 RC1 suitable for production use?
I just started a new client project and made the jump to .9 ... so far I'd say it's more than usable. Sure, it might be somewhat of a moving target over the next month or two, but once you get everything working as it should there's no reason you have to keep pulling the updates, right? That's my take. The changes from .8 to .9 for extensions isn't all that drastic from my experiences - after a little bit of hacking I managed to update the simple product manager extension, and I've never created my own before. The bulk of the update work was with the UI changes needed but to me that's the easiest part. Lastly - .9 is s much prettier. Just my $.02. - Joel On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Charles Roper wrote: Great, thanks for the feedback, that's most helpful. A couple of further questions if it's not too much trouble: - Will upgrading from .8 to .9 be straightforward? That depends on what extensions you are using. The interface has changed quite a bit and some extensions may not have been updated. There are fallbacks which should ensure that everything works, however some extension might need some UI tweaks. We're going to be merging in the i18n branch shortly. - When you say 'soon' do you have a time-frame in mind or do you mean 'as soon as possible'? As soon as possible, but likely within a month or so. Cheers, Charles On 16 March 2010 14:51, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: I'd agree with that. But I do want to get 0.9 out soon. I want to squash as many of the issues on github as possible and merge in the i18n work. On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:45 AM, john muhl wrote: if you want to use 0.9 i'd recommend using the current master branch as the RC1 release is far, far behind the current work. personally i'm still starting new projects with 0.8.1 mostly because these are sites for clients and being profitable means i don't want to be tracking a moving target; not because 0.9 is unstable or anything. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Charles Roper reac...@charlesroper.co.uk wrote: I'm about to start a new Radiant site and was wondering whether I should go with 0.9RC1 or 0.8.1? In the opinion of the community, is RC1 stable enough for production use? ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
[Radiant] 0.9 RC1 suitable for production use?
I'm about to start a new Radiant site and was wondering whether I should go with 0.9RC1 or 0.8.1? In the opinion of the community, is RC1 stable enough for production use? Cheers, Charles ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
Re: [Radiant] 0.9 RC1 suitable for production use?
if you want to use 0.9 i'd recommend using the current master branch as the RC1 release is far, far behind the current work. personally i'm still starting new projects with 0.8.1 mostly because these are sites for clients and being profitable means i don't want to be tracking a moving target; not because 0.9 is unstable or anything. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Charles Roper reac...@charlesroper.co.uk wrote: I'm about to start a new Radiant site and was wondering whether I should go with 0.9RC1 or 0.8.1? In the opinion of the community, is RC1 stable enough for production use? Cheers, Charles ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
Re: [Radiant] 0.9 RC1 suitable for production use?
I'd agree with that. But I do want to get 0.9 out soon. I want to squash as many of the issues on github as possible and merge in the i18n work. On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:45 AM, john muhl wrote: if you want to use 0.9 i'd recommend using the current master branch as the RC1 release is far, far behind the current work. personally i'm still starting new projects with 0.8.1 mostly because these are sites for clients and being profitable means i don't want to be tracking a moving target; not because 0.9 is unstable or anything. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Charles Roper reac...@charlesroper.co.uk wrote: I'm about to start a new Radiant site and was wondering whether I should go with 0.9RC1 or 0.8.1? In the opinion of the community, is RC1 stable enough for production use? ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
Re: [Radiant] 0.9 RC1 suitable for production use?
Great, thanks for the feedback, that's most helpful. A couple of further questions if it's not too much trouble: - Will upgrading from .8 to .9 be straightforward? - When you say 'soon' do you have a time-frame in mind or do you mean 'as soon as possible'? Cheers, Charles On 16 March 2010 14:51, Jim Gay j...@saturnflyer.com wrote: I'd agree with that. But I do want to get 0.9 out soon. I want to squash as many of the issues on github as possible and merge in the i18n work. On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:45 AM, john muhl wrote: if you want to use 0.9 i'd recommend using the current master branch as the RC1 release is far, far behind the current work. personally i'm still starting new projects with 0.8.1 mostly because these are sites for clients and being profitable means i don't want to be tracking a moving target; not because 0.9 is unstable or anything. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Charles Roper reac...@charlesroper.co.uk wrote: I'm about to start a new Radiant site and was wondering whether I should go with 0.9RC1 or 0.8.1? In the opinion of the community, is RC1 stable enough for production use? ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
