[Radiant] Passenger vs thin/mongrel/ebb

2009-09-15 Thread Ollivier Robert
Hello, I've been using mongrel then thin for my small website, with two instances (I have a dual core machine) withlittle or no problem (except when I tried to run 0.8.0, more on this after I'll have tried 0.8.1). Now, I've been hearing about the so called mod_rails aka Passenger. Is there any

Re: [Radiant] Passenger vs thin/mongrel/ebb

2009-09-15 Thread Jim Gay
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Ollivier Robert kel...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I've been using mongrel then thin for my small website, with two instances (I have a dual core machine) withlittle or no problem (except when I tried to run 0.8.0, more on this after I'll have tried 0.8.1).  Now,

Re: [Radiant] Passenger vs thin/mongrel/ebb

2009-09-15 Thread Charlie Robbins
Passenger does work well with Radiant, but in some instances you might need to chown or chgrp certain directories to the DefaultPassengerUser that you've specified in your respective config file (Apache or nginx). Some places I've had to do this recently (assuming radiant mysite) (...)/mysite

Re: [Radiant] Passenger vs thin/mongrel/ebb

2009-09-15 Thread Charlie Robbins
I was running Gallery. Don't really need it anymore. Really wish someone could just introduce the concept of a Gallery (or Group of assets) to Paperclipped. Having two separate extensions managing my assets seems redundant to me. Charlie On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Nate Turnage

Re: [Radiant] Passenger vs thin/mongrel/ebb

2009-09-15 Thread Steven Southard
As far as paperclipped doing a group of assets it's pretty much there. You can attach images to a page and then using r:assets:each / display all those images. Steven On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Charlie Robbins wrote: I was running Gallery. Don't really need it anymore. Really wish