On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Sean Cribbs seancri...@gmail.com wrote:
I've pushed some changes that should alleviate this issue. Thanks to Jeroen
for getting the ball rolling on the integration specs.
Hi Sean,
Thank you for solving this issue (I can confirm it works on IE now aswell)
Joe Van Dyk wrote:
Anyone worked with ExpressionEngine? How does it compare to Radiant?
I own a copy (and can sell/transfer it to you if you end up wanting to go
with it).
I'd hoped that, because it was a mature product, it'd be quicker to get up
and running than with Radiant, where the
Sean,
You had mentioned that you were using an extension with the templates
extension that allowed you to change the status of the page outside of a
templated page? Can you tell me which extension that was? The site I am
building makes extensive use of the templates extension, and it is really
Nate,
It was something internal to Redken. Like the templates popup menu, it
added a status menu to the appropriate column in the sitemap. Both
times I've used templates in a project, we've had something else
managing the status, so we didn't need it in the edit view. However, I
believe
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Sean Cribbs seancri...@gmail.com wrote:
Nate,
It was something internal to Redken. Like the templates popup menu, it
added a status menu to the appropriate column in the sitemap. Both times
I've used templates in a project, we've had something else
Hi folks:
I accidently removed the body of the home page in the contest site. I
was looking around and getting inspiration - its quite amazing - and
thought I was in my test site, when I cut the text. So sorry.
Matt
___
Radiant mailing list
Post:
Adam van den Hoven wrote:
I think this highlights why some sort of versioning really shouldn't
be an optional part of radiant. Distribute it as an extension, but
make it one of those extensions that comes by default. This way
everyone has some protection but I can substitute my own advanced
The template is refreshed every hour, just like the demo site. No worries.
Sean
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
Adam van den Hoven wrote:
I think this highlights why some sort of versioning really shouldn't
be an optional part of radiant. Distribute it as an extension, but
make it one of those
I'm getting a sporadic error, which kind of scares me. Every once and
a while, when I click on the Show Assets Bucket the bucket will
popup, but then, instead of letting me click and drag the asset into
the text field below, it just drags the entire bucket popup around.
I'm assuming its
Could it be that the pages are not saved yet. Or the parts? There is a
limitation in the drag and drop script that only lets it drop onto
parts that have been saved. I could solve it in jQuery, but Radiant
uses Prototype.If anyone has an idea, I am always acceptin patvhes.
Keith
On Jan
Yeah, that seems to be it. I was going to say I thought it had to do
with using the same bucket more than once. But that could also be the
problem. Thanks!
Adam
On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Keith Bingman wrote:
Could it be that the pages are not saved yet. Or the parts? There is
a
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Mohit Sindhwani t...@onghu.com wrote:
Adam van den Hoven wrote:
I think this highlights why some sort of versioning really shouldn't be an
optional part of radiant. Distribute it as an extension, but make it one of
those extensions that comes by default. This
Agreed, except for the asset manager, sort of.
I can think that an asset manager is going to be something that will
be ideosyncratic for many people. I would REALLY like to see not only
a standard asset manager but also an architecture that allows me to
write my own asset manager without
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Joe Van Dyk j...@pinkpucker.net wrote:
Other things that we think most people would want by default:
- some sort of rich text editor
I use the It's all text Firefox extension and edit all my code in
Textmate. ;^)
- asset manager better integrated
I would
I setup the edge radiant on my localhost using passenger / apache.
Had to remove public/.htaccess to get the stylesheets and the js to be
served.
Should .htaccess be removed or modified?
Joe
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Nate Turnage pixeln...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Joe Van Dyk j...@pinkpucker.net wrote:
Other things that we think most people would want by default:
- some sort of rich text editor
I use the It's all text Firefox extension and edit
I've got rspec 1.12 installed as a gem. I did the submodule init and
submodule update dance. When I run rake...
Running Integration Spec Task
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in
`gem_original_require': no such file to load -- spec/rails
(MissingSourceFile)
-1 on the rich text editor from over here
Joe Van Dyk wrote:
Other things that we think most people would want by default:
- some sort of rich text editor
- asset manager better integrated
It would be great to have these as extensions, but installed by
default. Having an officially blessed
On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Joe Van Dyk wrote:
I agree, paperclipped is the way to go. It's great to use
imagemagick directly.
I've had the opposite experience. It's easier for me to install
page_attachment (and it's requirements) than trouble-shoot Paperclip's
load on my server
Hi,
I need to have the tag list for each page coming out of:
r:children:each limit=15 order=desc
I'd use a:
r:tag_cloud scope=r:url / /
but since that's not allowed by radius I am now clueless. How would
you do it? Is anybody doing such a thing?
Cheers,
Enrico
You need rspec-rails as well.
Sean
Joe Van Dyk wrote:
I've got rspec 1.12 installed as a gem. I did the submodule init and
submodule update dance. When I run rake...
Running Integration Spec Task
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in
`gem_original_require': no
On Jan 27, 2009, at 7:38 PM, john muhl wrote:
I'd like to get some kind of idea what the most popular extensions
are.
I don't know how popular they are, but so far I've deployed four
Radiant sites (v 0.7) which use:
Reorder
Copy/Move
Page Attachments
The other two extensions high on my
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:38 PM, john muhl johnm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to get some kind of idea what the most popular extensions
are.
76b794c12f184abb342f7bf96c5382f106758ffc vendor/extensions/copy_move
(76b794c)
e27cab9e0d513dff61e1e54c465ee4f2798102b2
On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:19 PM, Marshal Linfoot wrote:
Love to see Copy/Move and Reorder in one extension so I could copy/
move
anywhere, including within the same parent page tree (like reorder).
Agreed. And it would streamline the interface too.
Jose
I have quite a few radiant sites, and the most common extensions I
have installed are:
* import_export
* page_list_view
* search
* copy_move
* file_system
* page_attachments
* reorder
* sitemap_search
On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:41 PM, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
john muhl wrote:
I'd like to get some
The thread on what standard plugins do people use as well the Oops
I deleted the contest2 content thread got me thinking that it would
be great if someone wrote a tutorial to the effect of, How to
customize your Radiant command.
Usually I start 90% of my radiant sites by installing the
Greetings everyone,
I posted a few months back for some help on a custom extension, and although
you all were most helpful (particularly Jim Gay), I'm afraid I quickly found
myself in over my head and had to find another way to tackle the problem.
I've now got a new project that I'm hoping is
27 matches
Mail list logo
