On 26/02/09 05:58, somebody called Mark Glossop (li...@cueballcentral.com)
wrote this:
> Hi all - first time poster here [didn't want to hijack the thread about
> Dreamhost, so started a new one...I have a very specific question, related to
> the OP about Dreamhost.]
>
> It's good to be hearing t
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Mark Glossop wrote:
On 26/02/09 05:58, somebody called Mark Glossop (li...@cueballcentral.com
)
wrote this:
Hi all - first time poster here [didn't want to hijack the thread
about
Dreamhost, so started a new one...I have a very specific question,
related to
Jim Gay wrote:
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Mark Glossop wrote:
On 26/02/09 05:58, somebody called Mark Glossop
(li...@cueballcentral.com)
wrote this:
Hi all - first time poster here [didn't want to hijack the thread about
Dreamhost, so started a new one...I have a very specific question,
Jim Gay wrote:
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Mark Glossop wrote:
On 26/02/09 05:58, somebody called Mark Glossop
(li...@cueballcentral.com)
wrote this:
Evidently that's not enough of a reason for me to _not_ use it,
but the question remains:
Why is Radiant delivered as a gem with "all the
My apologies that my previous mail went out twice.
Mohit.
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
I previously added page_attachments to a project as a submodule and
checked out commit '81124e9362e' and now I would like to try and check
out the 0.6.9 tag instead, but nothing is working.
I tried going to the extension directory and checking out commit 'f07ba434'.
I tried doing 'git reset --
On 27/02/09 13:02, somebody called Mohit Sindhwani (t...@onghu.com) wrote
this:
[snip]
>>>
>>> Sorry to nag, but - anyone? Bueller?
>>>
>>> In case this was somehow regarded as trollbait, I'm asking this as a
>>> legitimate query...it really is quite important for me to know, and
>>> time is
>>>
