We've got a 4 question survey up about your usage of Snippets.
Please take 30 seconds to respond and it will help us with development
of the next version or Radiant.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dERRVVlHekpDbVNXcDd3RFI1MGNwVlE6MA..
--
Jim Gay
http://www.saturnflyer.com
Jim Gay wrote:
We've got a 4 question survey up about your usage of Snippets.
Please take 30 seconds to respond and it will help us with development
of the next version or Radiant.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dERRVVlHekpDbVNXcDd3RFI1MGNwVlE6MA..
[check!] done.
Cheers,
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
[check!] done.
Ditto that. But I don't really see snippets fitting neatly in either a
design or content section. I use them for both.
~Nate
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search:
Done!
On 9/22/09, Nate pixeln...@gmail.com wrote:
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
[check!] done.
Ditto that. But I don't really see snippets fitting neatly in either a
design or content section. I use them for both.
~Nate
___
Radiant mailing list
Post:
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
Nate wrote:
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
[check!] done.
Ditto that. But I don't really see snippets fitting neatly in either
a design or content section. I use them for both.
and that's why there's an option to select that. I always explain
snippets as reusable pieces
Nate,
I have no problem deleting a page with an attachment and I'm running
0.8.1 with the latest page_attachments extension as well. Do you have
any other extensions that might be interfering? If it's broken for
you, I'm glad to fix it (it's my fault), but I need to be able to
replicate
Really nice update, guys. Thanks for your work on this.
~Nate
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
John W. Long wrote:
Hi all,
Looking for some feedback on something.
I'm thinking about changing the URL tags to operate on and return the
full URL. I'm also thinking adding a new set of path tags for the case
when you just want to work with the path.
This would mean that r:if_url, r:url,
Jim Gay wrote:
I think this is a good idea. Possibly painful, but ultimately good.
I'd like to broaden the discussion a bit and also suggest a change to
if_content so that it checks if content is not blank in a part, and
if_part which would check if the part exists. I think those names
would
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Nate pixeln...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim Gay wrote:
I think this is a good idea. Possibly painful, but ultimately good.
I'd like to broaden the discussion a bit and also suggest a change to
if_content so that it checks if content is not blank in a part, and
10 matches
Mail list logo