Re: [Radiant] Tag syntax (conditional tags)

2009-05-30 Thread Steven Southard
I was looking at the aggregation extension and thinking someone should add this patch, maybe me, and I found this fork which sounds like it should work: http://github.com/turingmachine/radiant-aggregation-extension/commit/66f7e5205eeb0620ce12e8911d24891c176a159f When I tried it out still d

Re: [Radiant] Tag syntax

2009-04-21 Thread Sean Cribbs
It probably won't because has its own version of . A patch to bring it in line would be greatly appreciated. Sean Steven Southard wrote: Will this tag work with under aggregate? I noticed it worked great under children but when I tried it under aggergate, not so good. Is there somethin

Re: [Radiant] Tag syntax

2009-04-21 Thread Steven Southard
Will this tag work with under aggregate? I noticed it worked great under children but when I tried it under aggergate, not so good. Is there something I would have to change about aggregate to make it work like that? Steven On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Sean Cribbs wrote: Rick DeNa

Re: [Radiant] Tag syntax

2009-04-21 Thread Sean Cribbs
Rick DeNatale added that at our January hack night, and it debuted in 0.7.0. Sean Jim Gay wrote: There is an "Available Tags" reference on every page edit screen where you can search for "unless_last" I don't recall this being added recently, but I've got it in a local 0.7.1 site. On Apr 2

Re: [Radiant] Tag syntax

2009-04-21 Thread Jim Gay
There is an "Available Tags" reference on every page edit screen where you can search for "unless_last" I don't recall this being added recently, but I've got it in a local 0.7.1 site. On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:29 AM, nicolas couturier wrote: I used this syntax: c

[Radiant] Tag syntax

2009-04-21 Thread nicolas couturier
I used this syntax: class="current" /> class="current" /> a bit spread out to try to understand. And got this : undefined tag `unless_last' *i'm working wih version 0.6.9 (gem). Is there a typo or this