Sean Cribbs wrote:
I feel we should let the UI changes drive that kind of change.
I originally posted to record my thoughts and possibly help others
understand what Radiant was "thinking" with it's roles. I
wholeheartedly agree with you here Sean. I see much of this already coming.
-Chr
Chris Parrish wrote:
Um, this thread's starting to deteriorate a bit.
@Alex - As you mentioned, I'm starting to like the component-ized
approach as it makes it possible for extension builders to integrate
new roles without breaking the UI (which oddly enough uses checkboxes
= component mental
Chris Parrish said the following on 22/06/08 06:22 PM:
>
> @ Anton - My choice of wording certainly is certainly objective but I
> chose it with the goal of conveying information to a lay user or small
> business owner to help them understand what the roles offer and what
> their boundaries are
Um, this thread's starting to deteriorate a bit.
@Alex - As you mentioned, I'm starting to like the component-ized
approach as it makes it possible for extension builders to integrate new
roles without breaking the UI (which oddly enough uses checkboxes =
component mentality).
@ Anton - My c
Jonathan McCoy said the following on 22/06/08 03:12 PM:
> Anton Aylward wrote:
>> blah
>
> Whatever. Nice argument. Sadly it fell apart shortly after "For most
> businesses...". The reality is quite different, and I can assure you
> that the ability to write copy, doesn't provide you with the co
