On 15/1/2013 10:01 PM, Jim Gay wrote:
The code should work with
But obviously something is wrong.
Ya, this doesn't work for me right now.
There are (or should be) 2 ways to use the aggregate tag.
- to collect a group of pages to iterate
- to collect a group of pages to iterate their childre
The code should work with
But obviously something is wrong.
There are (or should be) 2 ways to use the aggregate tag.
- to collect a group of pages to iterate
- to collect a group of pages to iterate their children
So both of these bits *should* work
... each of the aggregated pages
...
Thanks, John...
On 15/1/2013 5:12 AM, john wrote:
and
The above works fine! You found the problem!
In my case, the problem was that Line 2 (not Line 1):
1>
2>
3>
Line 2 should just be r:children:count, as you pointed out!
Best Regards,
Mohit.
Hello Jim, list,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:27 (-0500), Jim Gay wrote:
> Try putting the paths inside the aggregate like this:
>
> ...
That works, thank you very much for the hint!
Do you still want that issue in the tracker?
Best wishes,
Benito
and
work on the demo site. inside the aggregate tag you have a collection that
you still the use the children tags.
On Monday, January 14, 2013 2:04:25 PM UTC-6, Jim Gay wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Mohit Sindhwani
> >
> wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > On 15/1/2013
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 15/1/2013 12:27 AM, Jim Gay wrote:
>>
>> Benito,
>>
>> Try putting the paths inside the aggregate like this:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> I'd like to rework the way tags share information, but for now that
>> should do it.
>
>
> I was tr
Hi Jim,
On 15/1/2013 12:27 AM, Jim Gay wrote:
Benito,
Try putting the paths inside the aggregate like this:
...
I'd like to rework the way tags share information, but for now that
should do it.
I was trying to see if I could help, but I actually got the same error for:
==>
`aggregate
Benito,
Try putting the paths inside the aggregate like this:
...
I'd like to rework the way tags share information, but for now that
should do it.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Benito Torres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in radiant-1.1.1 (radius-0.7.3) this snippet:
>
>
>
>
>
> results in a
