Hello Barry -
Yes. You can use cascaded AuthBy clauses to do this sort of thing.
# define AuthBy clauses
AuthBy FILE
Identifier CheckUsers
Filename %D/users
/AuthBy
AuthBy UNIX
Identifier CheckGroup
.
/AuthBy
# define Realm(s) or Handler(s)
Realm ...
Hello Andy -
This is usually because the NAS-Identifier or NAS-IP-Address attribute in the
radius packet does not match the IP address of the Client clause.
regards
Hugh
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 23:07, Andy De Petter wrote:
Hello guys,
Has anyone seen these kinds of errors in their authlog?
I need to use these filters where would I add them ?
Ascend-Data-Filter=ip in forward tcp est
(Forward, if TCP session is established)
Ascend-Data-Filter=ip in forward dstip 0.0.0.0/24
(Forward, if the destination is the IP address of
SMTP Server)
Ascend-Data-Filter=ip in drop tcp dstport
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Hi
As far as I know, ODBC is the Only type of perl Connecto to SQL 7 or 2000.
The little think you have to have in count is that the efficiency can't be
entirely responsability of ODBC connector, it's the driver you
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Fwd: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member
submission from [Alex Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 18:30:08 -0500
From: Sergio Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 10:30, Sergio Gonzalez wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Hi
As far as I know, ODBC is the Only type of perl Connecto to SQL 7 or 2000.
You can also use DBD-Proxy, which works well. It connects to ODBC on the SQL
server
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Alex
Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 21:26:58 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 28 21:26:57 2001
Received: from
Hello Alex,
Hey guys,
I emailed you earlier today about using Radiator with SQL Server 2000.
I emailed ActiveState and got some information I thought pertained to this
problem and I was curious if it was possible to use the solution mentioned
below rather than ODBC. Thanks.
Both
