RE: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT returning IP address

2003-02-19 Thread Eli Tovbeyn
PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 February, 2003 08:17To: Eli TovbeynCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT returning IP address Hello Eli - One way of doing this is with cascaded AuthBy clauses, like

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT returning IP address

2003-02-19 Thread Hugh Irvine
: Wednesday, 19 February, 2003 08:17 To: Eli Tovbeyn Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT returning IP address Hello Eli - One way of doing this is with cascaded AuthBy clauses, like this: # define AuthBy clauses AuthBy FILE> Identifier CheckUsers Filename %D/users /AuthBy>

(RADIATOR) AuthBy NT returning IP address

2003-02-18 Thread Eli Tovbeyn
Title: Message Hi, I'm looking for nice solution for working with AuthBy NT and returning static IP address to every client. I'm working with Radiator 3.5. Any ideas arewelcome. Eli Tovbeyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT returning IP address

2003-02-18 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Eli - One way of doing this is with cascaded AuthBy clauses, like this: # define AuthBy clauses AuthBy FILE> Identifier CheckUsers Filename %D/users /AuthBy> AuthBy NT> Identifier CheckNT . /AuthBy> # define Realms or Handlers Realm > AuthBy CheckUsers . /Realm> The

(RADIATOR) AuthBy NT

2002-09-26 Thread Listuser
Howdy Folks, Just wondering if someone can help me out here. Trying to get Radiator to Auth against an NT/2000 domain. (Radiator on Linux). Following is the relevant config and trace.. I keep getting the following error: Thu Sep 26 09:02:43 2002: INFO: Access rejected for svc-vpn: NT

Re: (RADIATOR) Radiator AuthBY NT

2001-05-21 Thread Michael Audet
be doing PAP. If PAP doesn't work then you have something messed up -Michael Audet [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Alex Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:44 AM Subject: (RADIATOR) Radiator AuthBY NT Hi all, Why would my cisco access

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT problems

2001-04-09 Thread Michael Audet
(RADIATOR) AuthBy NT problems Hiyas, Just wondering about the AuthBy NT clause, it seems that there is a rather large delay (compared to say, database authentication and flatfile authentication) when using the AuthBy NT authenticator, the delays we are seeing are in the 5-10 second ma

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT problems

2001-04-09 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Steve - As Ashley says, there is a new version of AuthNT.pm in the patches area for Radiator 2.18, so I suggest you upgrade. regards Hugh At 13:33 +1000 01/4/9, Kent, Ashley wrote: the delays we are seeing are in the 5-10 second mark - would this be considered normal ? Just as you

(RADIATOR) AuthBy NT problems

2001-04-08 Thread Steve Phillips
Hiyas, Just wondering about the AuthBy NT clause, it seems that there is a rather large delay (compared to say, database authentication and flatfile authentication) when using the AuthBy NT authenticator, the delays we are seeing are in the 5-10 second mark - would this be considered normal ?

(RADIATOR) AuthBy NT problems

2001-04-08 Thread Kent, Ashley
the delays we are seeing are in the 5-10 second mark - would this be considered normal ? Just as you say - NT is a slow method for authentication if you are using the standard AuthBy NT module. I would suggest you contact Mike or Hugh and see if you can get the new version of this module. It

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT and CHAP

2000-10-24 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Dan - On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi The statement "AuthBy NT can not work with CHAP authentication" in the Radiator reference manual seems to indicate that such a thing is not possible (ever). Can anyone give a reason for this or if it is not true, verify

(RADIATOR) AuthBy NT and CHAP

2000-10-23 Thread dlangford
Hi The statement AuthBy NT can not work with CHAP authentication in the Radiator reference manual seems to indicate that such a thing is not possible (ever). Can anyone give a reason for this or if it is not true, verify the fact, or provide a workaround. ?D

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT: Account Expired and Account Locked

2000-01-10 Thread Mike McCauley
PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT: Account Expired and Account Locked Hello, I noticed that Radiator did not detect when an account is Expired or Locked (this is different from disabled) in the NT SAM May I suggest the following addition to the AuthNT.pm module: require Win32

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT: Account Expired and Account Locked

2000-01-10 Thread talist
Hello Mike, You are right the Win32::AdminMisc is not standard with ActivePerl. I got it via PPM install Win32-AdminMisc Hello. Thank you very much for your contribution. We have rolled most of it into the base code, and it will appear in the next release. However, we note that some of

(RADIATOR) AuthBy NT and Global Group ?

2000-01-07 Thread talist
Hello, Is is possible to authenticate NT passwords with Global Groups (instead of Local Group) I would like to divide several groups of users according to their global Group affiliation. === Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/ To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT and Global Group ?

2000-01-07 Thread Mike McCauley
Hello, On Jan 7, 10:30am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT and Global Group ? Hello, Is is possible to authenticate NT passwords with Global Groups (instead of Local Group) I would like to divide several groups of users according to their global Group affiliation

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy NT and Global Group ?

2000-01-07 Thread talist
While reading the "AuthBy NT" source code, I noticed the use of Win32::NetAdmin::GroupIsMember instead of Win32::NetAdmin::LocalGroupIsMember That lead me to believe that Radiator is checking in the Global Groups of the DomainControler I checked this theory on an NT box and it seems to be

(RADIATOR) AuthBy NT from Unix

1999-02-16 Thread Anton Sparrius
Hi, I've downloaded the 2.13beta which is supposed to be able to auth off an NT box whilst running on Linux. Firstly, let me say that it installed so easily on RH5.2. We have previously been using N, and it has not crashed once. (Radiator that is...NT crashes often) :) Anyway, Radiator is