Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-28 Thread Dyonisius Visser
On 14/06/2011 15:21, Heikki Vatiainen wrote: Linux also has this special file to control the system wide behaviour: /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only If I do this to enable the option: echo 1 |sudo tee /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only the same configuration works: BindAddress ipv6:::,

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-14 Thread Alexander Hartmaier
Does this mean that we can't bind to IPv4 and IPv6 separately on Linux to not get v6 mapped v4 addresses? Am 2011-06-09 19:50, schrieb Heikki Vatiainen: On 06/09/2011 05:37 PM, Dyonisius Visser wrote: Well, I installed a second instance on a dual stack host, and I tested various combinations:

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-14 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 06/14/2011 11:45 AM, Alexander Hartmaier wrote: Does this mean that we can't bind to IPv4 and IPv6 separately on Linux to not get v6 mapped v4 addresses? I think the mapped addresses are only seen when a wildcard IPv6 bind is done. If you bind to a non-wildcard IPv4 or IPv6 address, you

[RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Dyonisius Visser
Hi guys I've just fixed a problem where requests coming in to our Radiator instance via IPv6 were not recognized. I did not configure the BindAddress paramater, which defaults to 0.0.0.0. So, this was the error. After reading up on the docs, I could not find a way to have it listen to all IPv6.

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, Could it be the same as other apps, '::' ? I have now configured the hard coded addresses as a work aroudn. goodies/ipv6.cfg BindAddress ipv6::: (this is basically saying, use ipv6: and bind to :: - like other daemons do) please note that you must use ipv6: as the prefix to

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Dyonisius Visser
On 09/06/2011 12:48, Alan Buxey wrote: Hi, Could it be the same as other apps, '::' ? I have now configured the hard coded addresses as a work aroudn. goodies/ipv6.cfg BindAddress ipv6::: (this is basically saying, use ipv6: and bind to :: - like other daemons do) So this

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, So this should make it listen for all IPv4 and IPv6: BindAddress 0.0.0.0,ipv6::: on Solaris thats certainly true I heard that this might caused problems with Linux kernels? BindAddress 0.0.0.0 BindAddress ipv6::: that works on the few Linux boxes that I've tested alan

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 06/09/2011 01:56 PM, Dyonisius Visser wrote: On 09/06/2011 12:48, Alan Buxey wrote: Hi, Could it be the same as other apps, '::' ? I have now configured the hard coded addresses as a work aroudn. goodies/ipv6.cfg BindAddress ipv6::: (this is basically saying, use ipv6: and bind to

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, BindAddress 0.0.0.0,ipv6::: its horribly broken on Linux isnt it? on Solaris this works fine in this incantation. alan ___ radiator mailing list radiator@open.com.au http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 06/09/2011 03:03 PM, Alan Buxey wrote: BindAddress 0.0.0.0,ipv6::: its horribly broken on Linux isnt it? on Solaris this works fine in this incantation. Heh, I guess it can be said its broken, or this is just one posibility to do it. For those who are interested, see for example

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Dyonisius Visser
Well, I installed a second instance on a dual stack host, and I tested various combinations: BindAddress 192.87.30.31,ipv6:2001:610:148:dead::31 I.e. hardcoded addresses - this works, both IPv4 and IPv6 clients work BindAddress ipv6::: IPv4 blocked (NOTICE: Request from unknown client

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Buxey
hi, I can confirm exactly the same behaviour on Linux boxes here. hardcoded is the only way to have both working. Solaris can have both on single line and it works. a nice patch for 4.8 to arrive? :-) alan ___ radiator mailing list

Re: [RADIATOR] BindAddress question

2011-06-09 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 06/09/2011 05:37 PM, Dyonisius Visser wrote: Well, I installed a second instance on a dual stack host, and I tested various combinations: Thanks for the summary. BindAddress 192.87.30.31,ipv6:2001:610:148:dead::31 I.e. hardcoded addresses - this works, both IPv4 and IPv6 clients work

Re: (RADIATOR) BindAddress multiple IPs?

2002-10-31 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Jeremy, Yes from memory, only one BindAddress can currently be used, but I can see that multiple qaddresses might be usefule, and prob not too hard to implement. I will look when I am back on Nov 4. Cheers. On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:31, Hugh Irvine wrote: Hello Jeremy - I have copied this

(RADIATOR) BindAddress multiple IPs?

2002-10-28 Thread Jeremy Hinton
Hugh crew, From reading the docs, and my own testing, it looks like the BindAddress parameter can only accept a single IP. As a result, it looks like you're limited to either having radiator respond on all IPs, or just on one. If this is not the case, someone please feel free to correct me.

(RADIATOR) BindAddress

2001-08-19 Thread Harrison Ng
Title: BindAddress Hello, We are using Radiator 2.18.2 on RH6.2. The BindAddress parameter works only on radius authentication but not accounting request. We use tcpdump to check where has the packet gone, it said udp port radacct unreachable. I have no idea how to solve it, can anyone give

Re: (RADIATOR) BindAddress

2001-08-19 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Harrison - Could you please send me a copy of your Radiator configuration file (no secrets) together with a complete trace 4. I would also like to see the command line that you have used to start Radiator and the command line you have used for radpwtst. thanks Hugh On Monday 20

Re: (RADIATOR) BindAddress

2001-05-16 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Andy - This is almost always an OS issue - it decides what interface to use, not Radiator. regards Hugh At 12:49 +0200 15/5/01, Andy De Petter wrote: Hi, I have a question, concerning the BindAddress to multiple interfaces, on the same machine. When I don't bind Radiator to a

(RADIATOR) BindAddress

2001-05-15 Thread Andy De Petter
Hi, I have a question, concerning the BindAddress to multiple interfaces, on the same machine. When I don't bind Radiator to a specific interface, it listens (by default) on -all- interfaces. Now, when I have RADIUS requests coming in from NAS, on a virtual interface, Radiator will always

(RADIATOR) BindAddress for SNMPAgent

2001-04-10 Thread Andy De Petter
Hello, It seems that the BindAddress attribute, for SNMPAgent isn't working properly on my site. I'm running Radiator 2.17.1, and I have this in my configuration file, for my authentication radiator server: SNMPAgent Community public BindAddress 192.168.1.97

(RADIATOR) BindAddress question

2000-08-03 Thread Jason J. Horton
Is it possible to bind to more than one IP address per installation? -- -Jason J. Horton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat Man in a Little Coat Intercom Online Inc. 212.376.7440 | http://www.intercom.com === Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/ Announcements on

Re: (RADIATOR) BindAddress question

2000-08-03 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Jason - On Fri, 04 Aug 2000, Jason J. Horton wrote: Is it possible to bind to more than one IP address per installation? No - but it is possible to run multiple copies of Radiator, each on a different IP address and/or port number. hth Hugh -- Radiator: the most portable, flexible