Re: (RADIATOR) DBD::Sybase/FreeTDS/MSSQL7 Problems

2000-02-24 Thread Chris Hanes
Hi all, Mike has identified the problem as a NUL character being added to the password coming from the SQLServer. The problem appears to be occuring in the DBD:Sybase module. I modified some example ct-lib code that came with FreeTDS and it pulled strings from the SQLServer fine - no NUL

Re: (RADIATOR) DBD::Sybase/FreeTDS/MSSQL7 Problems

2000-02-24 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Chris, On Feb 24, 4:24pm, Chris Hanes wrote: Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) DBD::Sybase/FreeTDS/MSSQL7 Problems Hi all, Mike has identified the problem as a NUL character being added to the password coming from the SQLServer. The problem appears to be occuring in the DBD:Sybase module. I

Re: (RADIATOR) Best mechanism for client - Realm mappings?

2000-02-24 Thread Mike McCauley
Hello Rakesh, Radiator 2.15 supports a new check items Cleint-Id and NasType. Using them, you could set up Handlers for each type of NAS, or for each individual Client. Handlers also allow you to specifiy the Realm as a regexp. Therefore, you could set up a handler something like: Handler

(RADIATOR) Same AcctLogFileName for two handlers

2000-02-24 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi guys, If I have the same AcctLogFileName for two different handlers, will the writing of the detail file be messed up by the two handlers writing to it at the same time? Andrew === Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/ To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe

Re: (RADIATOR) Same AcctLogFileName for two handlers

2000-02-24 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Andrew, On Feb 25, 11:42am, Andrew Pollock wrote: Subject: (RADIATOR) Same AcctLogFileName for two handlers Hi guys, If I have the same AcctLogFileName for two different handlers, will the writing of the detail file be messed up by the two handlers writing to it at the same time? No.

(RADIATOR) Best mechanism for client - Realm mappings?

2000-02-24 Thread Rakesh Patel
I am looking for some advice - my goal is to have users with separate permissions for different clients based upon client name. I am using AuthBy PAM (kerberos) for password authentication, and requiring AuthBy File for specifying which users are valid and defining their return attributes. I