Hello Daniel -
You can either use Include file(s) in your configuration file, or you can use
the ClientListSQL clause to store the definitions in a database.
hth
Hugh
On Wednesday 21 March 2001 18:31, daniel wrote:
Hi,
I have to add lots of IdenticalClients and I was wondering if it
is
Thanks Arjan -
I have forwarded your suggestions to Mike for consideration.
cheers
Hugh
On Tuesday 20 March 2001 19:33, Arjan Waardenburg wrote:
Hi all,
I made some modifications to the AuthRADIUS.pm and maybe other folks can
use them.
The first one is to choose beforehand which port
Hello Brian -
Whatever NAS-like device you use to terminate your PPPoE sessions looks to
Radiator like any other NAS. If the device reports packets in/out and bytes
in/out in accounting records you will record them just the same as with any
other NAS.
hth
Hugh
On Wednesday 21 March 2001
Hello Griff -
You are correct, if a Client clause does not catch a request, it should be
rejected. An easy test is to dummy up some authentication requests with
radpwtst and do some experiments. Use a trace 4 and check what is happening.
hth
Hugh
On Wednesday 21 March 2001 09:16, Griff
Hugh,
Is a NAS-like device required for PPPoE? If so, can you (or anyone) suggest
one?
Regards, Brian Morris
- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:48 PM
Subject: Re:
Hi everyone,
I'm kind new here and I am having problems with L2TP.
My telco provider offers RAS ports via ERICSSON TIGRIS. We've configured a
L2TP tunnel from their TIGIRS to my gateway router, a Cisco 3640 via vpdn.
All is well, authentication and accounting, but the session timeout does not
That's to be discussed, depending on the amount of concurrent users you're
expecting :)
Of course RedBack is better, but for low-profile ISP, DANA will do aswell.
-Andy
-Original Message-
From: Karl, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: woensdag 21 maart 2001 17:20
To: 'Andy
Redback
Matthew C. Karl
Florida State University
Office of Telecommunications, MIS
-Original Message-
From: Andy De Petter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Brian Morris
Cc: Radiator Mailing
Subject:RE: (RADIATOR) PPPOE
Hello again,
I've been reading about the session-timeout with cisco by using their
av-pair. I anyone kind enough to show me how to implement this av-pair on
my radius config file.
You help will be deeply appreciated.
Thanks everyone!!!
Jiame
===
Archive at
Hi all,
I write again to this list to report a strange behavior :
I want to limit simultaneous logins : Each user can be logged on once at
a time.
[In the bottom, you can find interesting parts of my config file.]
My trouble is the following : When I want to test that he second
simultaneous
Hi all,
This question is a little off-topic, but I have seen some CVX-1800 users
post to the list before who are using them with radiator as we are.
We are having trouble with customers that are assigned static-ips via
radiator being able to route to other customers who are just automatically
Salut Fred -
Comment va la vie? Je suis desole qu'on s'est pas vu lors de ma derniere
visite a Paris - mais peut-etre la prochaine fois?
On Thursday 22 March 2001 04:50, Frederic Gargula wrote:
Hi all,
I write again to this list to report a strange behavior :
I want to limit
Hello Brian -
On Wednesday 21 March 2001 21:57, Brian Morris wrote:
Hugh,
Is a NAS-like device required for PPPoE? If so, can you (or anyone)
suggest one?
PPPoE translates to "Point to Point Protocol over Ethernet", and just like
using PPP over modems, you need two ends to make a
Hello Jaime -
On Thursday 22 March 2001 04:56, Jaime Elizaga Jr. wrote:
Hello again,
I've been reading about the session-timeout with cisco by using their
av-pair. I anyone kind enough to show me how to implement this av-pair on
my radius config file.
You help will be deeply
Hello Kevin -
On Thursday 22 March 2001 09:42, Kevin Wormington wrote:
Hi all,
This question is a little off-topic, but I have seen some CVX-1800 users
post to the list before who are using them with radiator as we are.
We are having trouble with customers that are assigned static-ips via
They are actually in two different subnets and we are using static routing.
I can ping or traceroute either address from anywhere on the internet, they
just can't see each other.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kevin Wormington [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
Salut Fred, Salut Tout-le-monde -
There is a slight error in Radiator 2.18 when using MaxSessions in a Realm or
Handler. There is a patched version of Handler.pm in the patches area.
Merci a Fred de l'avoir trouve!
A+
Hugues
--
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable
17 matches
Mail list logo
