(RADIATOR) logs on radiator 3

2002-04-08 Thread Jesús M Díaz
Hello all, how can i get logs of DEBUG level WITHOUT packet dump? my LOG clause is: Log FILE Filename %L/%Y/%m/AC-Logfile-%Y%m%d LogFormat %Y%m%d%H%M%S.%N %1: %2 Identifier LogLab Trace 4 /Log on radiator 2.18, with the same log clause i got debugs messages but not the packet dump.

Re: (RADIATOR) logs on radiator 3

2002-04-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Jesus - Yes this has changed - now a trace 4 will always give the packet dumps. Why is this a problem? regards Hugh On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 17:36, Jesús M Díaz wrote: Hello all, how can i get logs of DEBUG level WITHOUT packet dump? my LOG clause is: Log FILE Filename

(RADIATOR) Problem with upgrade 2.19 - 3.0

2002-04-08 Thread Mike McCauley
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Andy De Petter [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:43:44 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 7 22:43:44 2002 Received: from

(RADIATOR) Dear sir,

2002-04-08 Thread Tuvia Rothem
Dear sir, A few days ago I had received the 'Radiator' for testing it from 'Encotone Ltd' in Jerusalem. I'm using a very small database with TeleID (smartcard) users and the file 'users' for those without TeleID. In this way, the radiator is working perfectly. Now I'm trying to merge between

(RADIATOR) Log SQL Trace 4 causes Radiator to hang.

2002-04-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. We have just purchased Radiator 3.0. After evaluating 2.19 I installed ver 3.0 with no problems. I am running Radiator on SunOS 5.8, Database is MS SQL Server 2000 on a windows 2000 Server, and Im using Easysoft ODBC - ODBC Bridge. All database activity works fine till now including

(RADIATOR) Session-Timeout in Cisco Ascend

2002-04-08 Thread Lull Paras
Hi all! does Session-Timeout attribute work in Cisco Ascend RAS? it doesn't seem to work in our current setup. we have Radiator 2.19 and multiple RAS (Cisco, Ascend, and Livingston). i have tried testing it on all RAS but it only works in livingston. when i'm using Cisco Ascend,

(RADIATOR) Account status field

2002-04-08 Thread Stephen Malenshek
Is there a way to make radiator look at an additional field to see if the account is in a suspended or valid state. For instance, I have a postgres database with the following fields: radius=# \d subscribers Table subscribers Attribute | Type | Modifier

RE: (RADIATOR) Account status field

2002-04-08 Thread Stephen Malenshek
That is exactly it How well does it work, and can we take it one step further with the following: In the radius.cfg file, I have the following statements: AuthLog FILE Identifier logger Filename %L/%m%Y-radius.log SuccessFormat %l: Auth:

RE: (RADIATOR) Account status field

2002-04-08 Thread Ronan Eckelberry
I'm not sureI looked in the AuthLog FILE section of the manual before, and didn't really see a way to do it. On mine, if they fail, it just gives the reason of No such user. This is because of the AuthByPolicy I am using. Radiator inserts into the log the reason it gets from the

(RADIATOR) Re: Realm Default not being seen

2002-04-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Joseph - I will need to see a trace 4 debug from Radiator to say for sure, but it sounds like you are receiving a radius request from a user without a realm (ie. no @.). regards Hugh On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 23:47, Joseph Nguta wrote: Hi I have instaled and configured Radiator 2.19

Re: (RADIATOR) Session-Timeout in Cisco Ascend

2002-04-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Lull - This is usually a NAS configuration issue. You should check with your vendors, and also check the Radiator FAQ and the mailing list archive. regards Hugh On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 22:20, Lull Paras wrote: Hi all! does Session-Timeout attribute work in Cisco Ascend RAS? it

Re: (RADIATOR) Log SQL Trace 4 causes Radiator to hang.

2002-04-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello George - I will need to see a trace 4 debug from Radiator to tell for sure, but it sounds like the column that is defined in the database for the log messages is too small to cope with the debug messages plus the packet dumps. regards Hugh On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 20:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (RADIATOR) Dear sir,

2002-04-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Tuvia - You would do something like this: # define AuthBy clauses AuthBy PAM Identifier CheckTeleID . /AuthBy AuthBy FILE Identifier CheckUsers Filename %D/users NoDefaultIfFound . /AuthBy # define Realm(s) or Handler(s) Realm

(RADIATOR) MD4 module and installation directions

2002-04-08 Thread niceman
I would recommend that the installation procedure have MD4 listed as one of the recommended modules. After experiencing the same thing as many others here (being paged after all radius servers kept crashing at 3:00 AM), I found the same thing they did ... missing Digest::MD4.

(RADIATOR) Realm Default not being seen

2002-04-08 Thread Mike McCauley
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Joseph Nguta [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 07:08:33 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 8 07:08:33 2002 Received: from

(RADIATOR) Changes to patch tarball format

2002-04-08 Thread Mike McCauley
Hello All, for those of you familiar with the process of downloading and installing patches for Radiator there are some changes to the layout of the patch tarball. Previously, all the files in the tarball unpacked into the current directory, requiring you often to place them in their correct

(RADIATOR) Reply items from LDAP, Authentication elsewhere

2002-04-08 Thread petri . maenpaa
Hi, I have a working setup that authenticates against NIS+. Now I have a new NAS that has support software which stores NAS reply items in LDAP. Problem is that I cannot keep up-to-date user/password information in LDAP. So what I'd like to do (until I can move all user data to LDAP) is to