(RADIATOR) Config Emerald

2002-11-25 Thread Carlos Molina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings. We are testing radiator with emerald, but we are see on the debugs that the start/stop request query is: Mon Nov 25 11:28:47 2002: DEBUG: do query is: insert into Calls

(RADIATOR) domain issues

2002-11-25 Thread Mike McCauley
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Aaron Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:04:04 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 25 13:04:04 2002 Received: from

(RADIATOR) PostAuthHook nightmares.

2002-11-25 Thread Mike McCauley
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Steve Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:26:01 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 25 14:26:01 2002 Received: from

Re: (RADIATOR) PostAuthHook nightmares.

2002-11-25 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Steve - There are some example hooks including a ReplyHook that does pretty much what you require in the file goodies/hooks.txt. If you have any further questions, please let me know. regards Hugh Hey all, I have the following script (included below) that I use to assign an IP

Re: (RADIATOR) domain issues

2002-11-25 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Aaron - You should use a regular expression in your Realm or Handler: Realm /domain.com/i or Handler Realm = /domain.com/i The syntax //i is a case insensitive Perl regexp. regards Hugh I have a problem, that when a user has [EMAIL PROTECTED], if the have different case

Re: (RADIATOR) PostAuthHook nightmares.

2002-11-25 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Steve - I am not sure I understand your question regarding two instances of the hook. The usual case is to seperate the processing for the two cases using either Realms or (more generally) Handlers. And with an AuthBy FILE as you describe, you don't usually need a hook at all - you

(RADIATOR) Use single Handler or multiple Handler statements?

2002-11-25 Thread Elias
Hi Hugh, Will there be any performance difference if I structure my config file as below? a. Handler NAS-IP-Address = /a.a.a.a|b.b.b.b|c.c.c.c|d.d.d.d|e.e.e.e/ b.Handler NAS-IP-Address =/a.a.a.a/ Handler NAS-IP-Address =/b.b.b.b/ Handler NAS-IP-Address =/c.c.c.c/ Handler

Re: (RADIATOR) Use single Handler or multiple Handler statements?

2002-11-25 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Elias - In your case I would do this: # define Client clauses with Identifiers Client a.a.a.a Identifier WhatEver . /Client Client b.b.b.b Identifier WhatEver . /Client Client c.c.c.c Identifier WhatEver . /Client Client d.d.d.d Identifier WhatEver . /Client