Is their any significance in the different disconnect causes we receive from our
Ascends? We receive pppRcvTerminate and remoteEndhungup on a lot of sessions. if
anyone knows of reference for these that would be helpful also!
thanks
Frank
===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
We are using ascend 4000's and they seem to log a lot of information. Is there any
way to cull some of this out? For instance, we are not really concerned with the
customer's amount of octets and packets inputed and outputed
Frank
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
we are using 4000 series ascends and I have not seen those options (I will search the
archives, as noted below) either. However you do need to upgrade from 6.1.7 there are
some memory bugs in the earlier releases that causes fatal errors. The current
version is 7.0.26 and we are using
Hello--
I am looking for some input on a method, if possible, to assign all of my dial up
users ip addresses via radiator from one common pool. I have looked at the
FramedGroupBaseAddress and the FramedGroup attributes but I am not sure if this is the
correct way to approach this. It
we have started a new ISP service where users dial into to a remote NAS that then
authenticates the user across an L2F tunnel through our Cisco 7206. We can
authenticate the user and allow access, however in the initial accounting record the
Cisco does not seem to pass the ip address it has
Hello--
We have Ascend NASes and a Cisco router that has other NASes connected to it via L2F
tunnels. We are trying to restrict who can telnet to the Cisco router. Previously, we
did not have the NASes connected to the Cisco so access was restricted by placing the
Cisco in a separate realm
Hello--
We have tried to implement Handlers which work, sorta! We now can allow any user to
connect to our Ascends despite their Service-Type and we can restrict who can telnet
to the Cisco. However, when we try to dial into the external NAS that is connected to
the Cisco as a normal user
owing what is happening.
thanks
Hugh
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, FlintHillsTechnical Support wrote:
Hello--
We have tried to implement Handlers which work, sorta! We now can allow any user
to connect to our Ascends despite their Service-Type and we can restrict who can
telnet to the Cisco. Howeve