RE: (RADIATOR) How to suppress an answer from a remote Radius host

2000-01-19 Thread Arturo Pina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Because the radius protocol specifies a retransmission policy (due to UDP), if Radiator does not see a response to a Request that it has sent, it will continue to resend the packet until it receives a reply or until it has sent the

RE: (RADIATOR) How to suppress an answer from a remote Radius host

2000-01-18 Thread Arturo Pina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I see. Unfortunately, I don't see any way that you can avoid the two Accounting-Accept's. I've copied Mike on this so he can offer his opinion, but it looks to me like this is the way it is. Hi Hugh, So what should happen if we had the Acct

RE: (RADIATOR) How to suppress an answer from a remote Radius host

2000-01-17 Thread Arturo Pina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I don't quite understand your question above - what are you referring to when you say "Radiator sends two acct ack replies to the remote proxy server"? From your configuration above, Radiator only sends Accounting-Request's to the remote

RE: (RADIATOR) Accounting requests and online sessions.

2000-01-17 Thread Arturo Pina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On a related topic - this is the reason that many people use AccountingStopsOnly in their accounting database - because it is impossible to always match every Start and Stop (one of the disadvantages of UDP). Just a little question: Is it

(RADIATOR) How to suppress an answer from a remote Radius host

2000-01-14 Thread Arturo Pina
that Radiator didn't send an ack when it receives the reply from the server in port 1814. I saw about the same question at: http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/199904/msg00235.html but I didn't manage to understand it... I would like to know how it can be done. Thanks a lot. - -- Arturo Pina / [EMAIL

RE: (RADIATOR) Framed-Group

1999-10-22 Thread Arturo Pina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 we are planning on implementing a much more fully featured address management scheme in the near future (RSN:-)). WHAT? WHEN? HOW? Please give us more info! We've been waiting for this for months... I'll be gladly willing to collaborate with

RE: (RADIATOR) Acct packet loss

1999-08-30 Thread Arturo Pina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would suggest finding out where are the packets getting lost, first of all. Cheers, -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Rajesh Khator Enviado el: domingo, 29 de agosto de 1999 22:15 Para:

RE: (RADIATOR) Simulatnius-usae and Port-limit

1999-08-20 Thread Arturo Pina
ilar uses. It MAY also be sent by the NAS to the server as a hint that that many ports are desired for use, but the server is not required to honor the hint. So perhaps Acct-Multi-Session-Id and maybe Acct-Link-Count too could provide a handle on solving the problem. Well it was qui

RE: (RADIATOR) Simulatnius-usae and Port-limit

1999-08-16 Thread Arturo Pina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yup, yes, sí, oui :-) Or at least it should ... - -- Arturo Pina / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dpto. I+D / CTV-Jet (http://www.ctv-jet.com/) Tfno: +34 96 5845291 / Fax: +34 96 5844896 -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: (RADIATOR) Client, NAS-Type and Handler

1999-08-09 Thread Arturo Pina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Perhaps you should say it Handler Realm=foo.bar, NAS-IP-Address=/a\.b\.(c\.d|e\.f)/ this way? HTH - -- Arturo Pina / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dpto. I+D / CTV-Jet (http://www.ctv-jet.com/) Tfno: +34 96 5845291 / Fax: +34 96 5844896 -Mensaje

RE: (RADIATOR) Framed-Netmask Problems

1999-08-06 Thread Arturo Pina
information? Perhaps this could be the reason of the user falling through... Hope that helps. - -- Arturo Pina / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dpto. I+D / CTV-Jet (http://www.ctv-jet.com/) Tfno: +34 96 5845291 / Fax: +34 96 5844896 -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En

RE: (RADIATOR) Duplicate Accounting Entries

1999-03-30 Thread Arturo Pina
--- debis Systemhaus EDVg Internet Services Hofmühlgasse 3 - 5, 1060 Wien Tel.: +43 1 599 07 / 1749 Fax: +43 1 599 07 / 1199 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.debis.at To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message. - --- Arturo Pin

Re: (RADIATOR) syncing multiple users files question...

1999-03-24 Thread Arturo Pina
sending the updates across rather than the whole file. === To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message. - --- Arturo Pina - [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTV Internet [http://www.ctv.es/] +34 902 444557 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3i

(RADIATOR) FW: Hooks don't work!!!

1999-03-16 Thread Arturo Pina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi, As Mike is back, I'm resending this message to the list... TIA. - -FW: Hooks don't work!!!- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 13:43:18 +0100 (CET) From: Arturo Pina [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Hooks don't work!!! - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

RE: (RADIATOR) PostAuthHook Successes?

1999-03-12 Thread Arturo Pina
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= === To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message. - --- Arturo Pina - [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTV Internet [http://www.ctv.es/] +34 902 444557 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv

(RADIATOR) Hooks don't work!!!

1999-03-08 Thread Arturo Pina
a lot - --- Arturo Pina - [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTV Internet [http://www.ctv.es/] +34 902 444557 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBNuPGy9+A5jTOp/8tAQEU9AP8CYGtDCtl/dzccF9bRrKFX267FHKHHUj2 FjulXtILFNYbyekQHIkMSC4CjnPEEBRlnKj5QeA2/6wXzxPYXamTjfpKveDXOD3m DA9Na