On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:24:23AM +1000, Brian Morris wrote:
Would it be possible to setup the access server to simply ignore the call if
it does not display the caller ID. That way the 'customer' does not get
billed for the call.
I think that you will find that Ascend Max's send a packet
Would it be possible to setup the access server to simply ignore the call if
it does not display the caller ID. That way the 'customer' does not get
billed for the call.
You can do this on recent Bay 5399 software, and I think possibly
also some others (Ascend/Cisco/Tigris?)
===
Archive at
Hello Scott -
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Scott Gifford wrote:
I'd be very interested in knowing how to do this...Have you done it?
And do you have some details on how?
Here is a copy of the file "goodies/bayPortLimit.txt" from the distribution.
It is an explanation intended to support
I believe that you can use PERL regexps in the check items.
In that case, you can have in your users file:
#
# DEFAULT user to reject blank CLI
#
DEFAULT Calling-Station-ID=/^$/, Auth-Type="Reject"
I'm not sure if that'll work, but give it a try.
John
At 05:11 PM 9/16/99 +1000, you wrote:
Would it be possible to setup the access server to simply ignore the call if
it does not display the caller ID. That way the 'customer' does not get
billed for the call.
I remember some discussion about this in the Aussie-ISP mailing list a few
months ago.
Regards, Brian Morris
===
Archive
