Hi John.
Radiator is not tested here against any of those packages. However, a
billing package that uses mSQL should be amenable to interfacing with AuthBy
SQL.
There is a list a ISP billing packages that Radiator works with available on
the Radiator web site.
Cheers.
Hi Hugh.
Yes, thanks for that, the TimeBanking option helps and I can confirm that
the customer now does get cut off when their time goes into the negative.
However they can then dial-in again and get connected without a problem and
stay on-line for as long as they like. That is, if the
No joy Hugh...
Our setup is basic... can you see the problem ?
I test ring in from the office with a proper setup in the normal users
file, and it does not act on the rejectusers, and continues to
authenticate on the normal users file.
--
Trace 3
DbDir
No joy Hugh...
Our setup is basic... can you see the problem ?
I test ring in from the office with a proper setup in the normal users
file, and it does not act on the rejectusers, and continues to
authenticate on the normal users file.
--
Trace 3
DbDir
No joy Hugh...
Our setup is basic... can you see the problem ?
I test ring in from the office with a proper setup in the normal users
file, and it does not act on the rejectusers, and continues to
authenticate on the normal users file.
--
Trace 3
DbDir
Hi Gary -
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Gary wrote:
No joy Hugh...
Our setup is basic... can you see the problem ?
I test ring in from the office with a proper setup in the normal users
file, and it does not act on the rejectusers, and continues to
authenticate on the normal users file.
Greetings!
Just wanted to confirm my line of thinking on this with others. We want to
set up redundant radiator servers for our domain. We want to have a primary
and secondary, and NAS's will be told to check aaa in that order. If the
primary machine goes down, the secondary will still answer.
Hi Jay -
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Jay West wrote:
Greetings!
Just wanted to confirm my line of thinking on this with others. We want to
set up redundant radiator servers for our domain. We want to have a primary
and secondary, and NAS's will be told to check aaa in that order. If the
primary
I want to install mySQL for use with Radiator on FreeBSD 3.3Release.
The instructions say I'll need to install DBI and DBD. I can find DBI easily
and have installed it. However, where exactly do I find DBD for mySQL??
Thanks!
Jay West
===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 06:37:34AM -0500, Jay West wrote:
I want to install mySQL for use with Radiator on FreeBSD 3.3Release.
The instructions say I'll need to install DBI and DBD. I can find DBI easily
and have installed it. However, where exactly do I find DBD for mySQL??
You can
Hi,
I've just got hold of Radiator and I already run Platypus. Over
the next few days I intend to attempt to get them to work in unison.
Can anyone shed any light on the possible pitfalls and the things
I should be looking at before I start?
Thanks in advance
Before switching over to sql authentication I am cleaning up the users
file and adding DefaultReply to the various bits .
Now the old question...
is Service-Type = Framed-User a check or reply item... ??
Page 39 of the manual (hi Hugh :-) indicates its reply item, but I
thought it was a
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 12:13:45AM +1000, Gary wrote:
Before switching over to sql authentication I am cleaning up the users
file and adding DefaultReply to the various bits .
Now the old question...
is Service-Type = Framed-User a check or reply item... ??
Page 39 of the manual
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Hugh Irvine wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Jay West wrote:
Greetings!
Just wanted to confirm my line of thinking on this with others. We want to
set up redundant radiator servers for our domain. We want to have a primary
and secondary, and NAS's will be told to check aaa
Would it be possible to modify the AuthLDAP modules so that instead
of (or in addition to to maintain backward compatibility) having
a single attribute that holds all of the reply items we can instead
set things up more like the SQL modules?
What I mean is under SQL you can do things like:
Would it be possible to modify the way that AuthLDAP handles reply
attributes? Right now they are all listed in a singly replyattr
attribute. This is unwieldy for a lot of our tools and increases the
complexity of the parsing.
A better mechanism would be to handle them the same way as SQL is
I am running Radiator on a Debian Box. It has stopps running about once
every 60 days. It stopped running yesterday and then again today. The
restart wrapper is installed. However, when problems arise "ps aux | grep
rad" verifies that radius is not running. I was told to send my config file
and a
We have a set of users who are currently authenticating from a system, in
which the password is encrypted twice. So, copying the encrypted values
and inserting them into a normal password file, won't work for us. We've
set up a proxy in front of this auth server with Radiator, so that we can
Hello Gary -
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Gary wrote:
Before switching over to sql authentication I am cleaning up the users
file and adding DefaultReply to the various bits .
Now the old question...
is Service-Type = Framed-User a check or reply item... ??
Page 39 of the manual (hi Hugh
Thanks for the quick reply Hugh. That works but (IMHO) it defeats the
purpose of having a database if you have to put the complete attribute
pair into it.
I actually just spent an hour or so migrating some code from AuthSQL.pm
to AuthLDAP.pm to do exactly what I want. Works great.
Is there some
Hi!
I'm trying to add an attribute to my accounting table in MS SQL, with a
PreAuthHook clause, but it's not working right. Am I using the wrong
'Hook' clause?
When a user logs in with a "+ppp", then his session will be billable
(Class = "0"). Somehow the attribute Class = "0" is not being
Would it be possible to modify the way that AuthLDAP handles reply
attributes? Right now they are all listed in a singly replyattr
attribute. This is unwieldy for a lot of our tools and increases the
complexity of the parsing.
A better mechanism would be to handle them the same way as SQL
Are you authing' by SQL? If so, setup a field in your db that is for
reply attributes. Only fill in that field for the users who get something
special. Then in your auth clause setup something like:
DefaultReply Service-Type=Framed-User,Framed-IP-Address=255.255.255.254,\
Hello Aaron -
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Aaron Holtz wrote:
After making changes to match on Client-Id instead of Nas-IP-Address, I
don't seem to be able to make any matches whether I do exact matches or a
regex. Trace 4 dump:
I have just tested this here with no problems. Note that the
Hello Jay -
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Jay West wrote:
I want to install mySQL for use with Radiator on FreeBSD 3.3Release.
The instructions say I'll need to install DBI and DBD. I can find DBI easily
and have installed it. However, where exactly do I find DBD for mySQL??
The latest one I
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:37:55 +1000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
Hello Steve -
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Steven E. Ames wrote:
Would it be possible to modify the way that AuthLDAP handles reply
attributes? Right now they are all listed in a singly replyattr
attribute. This is unwieldy for a lot of our
26 matches
Mail list logo
