(RADIATOR) Bad authenticator in request read the FAQ's still not working

2001-11-01 Thread Andrew Kaplan
I'm trying to setup another 3COM Total Control Chassis. The first config works and is the first chassis. The second one fails with WARNING: Bad authenticator in request from 209.113.232.252 (209. 113.232.252) Please see bottom. Both NAS appear to be setup identically. Any suggestions would be

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator in request read the FAQ'sstill not working

2001-11-01 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Andrew - It looks to me like the shared secrets are different between the NAS and the Client clause. You only show an accounting request and if this is only happening with accounting requests (ie. authentication requests are working) then it is likely a software bug in the NAS that

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator in request from DEFAULT ?

2001-06-11 Thread Pascal Robert
On 5/31/01 19:40, Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, I have two other problems. The log file reports that Attributes 197 and 255 (Ascend-Xmit-Rate and Ascend-Data-Rate) are missing, even if they do are in the dictionnary (and accounting logs those attributes, strange). Can you

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator in request from DEFAULT ?

2001-06-11 Thread Robert G. Fisher
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 02:21:07PM -0400, Pascal Robert wrote: On 5/31/01 19:40, Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, I have two other problems. The log file reports that Attributes 197 and 255 (Ascend-Xmit-Rate and Ascend-Data-Rate) are missing, even if they do are in the

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator in request from DEFAULT ?

2001-06-11 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Robert, Salut Pascal - As Robert says, there are two sets of attributes for Ascend, the old ones that were stolen from the RFC standard set, and the new ones that implement the Ascend Vendor Specific Attributes (vendor 529). The standard Radiator dictionary (dictionary) includes the

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator in request from DEFAULT ?

2001-05-31 Thread Pascal Robert
On 5/28/01 20:06, Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Pascal - This is usually due to the shared secrets not being set correctly. Ok, I resolved this issue. For some reasons, I have some IdenticalClients lines that were more than 80 chars and it didn't like it. Now, I have two

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator in request from DEFAULT ?

2001-05-28 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Pascal - This is usually due to the shared secrets not being set correctly. If you would like to send me a copy of your configuration file (no secrets) together with a trace 4 debug I will take a look. regards Hugh On Tuesday 29 May 2001 03:16, Pascal Robert wrote: Hi, I installed

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator

2000-12-02 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Viraj - At 17:18 -0500 1/12/00, Viraj Alankar wrote: Hugh, Actually this client is in our clients file with the correct secret, and we indeed get proper accounting and authentication from it. However, I am also seeing those entries in the log so I'm wondering what it means. In

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator

2000-12-01 Thread Viraj Alankar
Hugh, Actually this client is in our clients file with the correct secret, and we indeed get proper accounting and authentication from it. However, I am also seeing those entries in the log so I'm wondering what it means. Thanks, Viraj. On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:

(RADIATOR) Bad authenticator

2000-11-28 Thread Viraj Alankar
Hello, I am noticing in my logs warnings similar to: WARNING: Bad authenticator in request from 1.2.3.4 The manual suggests that if I am gettings these, my accounting requests are not being store, and authentications are OK, to try IgnoreAcctSignature. However, I am getting

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator

2000-11-28 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Viraj - On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Viraj Alankar wrote: Hello, I am noticing in my logs warnings similar to: WARNING: Bad authenticator in request from 1.2.3.4 The manual suggests that if I am gettings these, my accounting requests are not being store, and authentications

(RADIATOR) RADIATOR : bad authenticator

2000-08-29 Thread Amiel David
Hi, We're using radiator on a Redhat 6.2 machine with a TNT Max. Though everything seems to work fine I've lots of error messages in the log file : Mon Aug 28 17:47:18 2000: WARNING: Bad authenticator in request from DEFAULT() Mon Aug 28 17:49:59 2000: WARNING: Bad authenticator in request

(RADIATOR) Bad Authenticator in request from DEFAULT

2000-05-16 Thread Asif Rumani
Hello, I have2 USR NetServers with 16 modem ports each. One out of the two works fine, authentication and accounting are done flawlessly. But the other produces the following error message during accounting-requests. Bad authenticator in request from DEFAULT Any help on the above would

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad Authenticator in request from DEFAULT

2000-05-16 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Asif - On Wed, 17 May 2000, Asif Rumani wrote: Hello, I have 2 USR NetServers with 16 modem ports each. One out of the two works fine, authentication and accounting are done flawlessly. But the other produces the following error message during accounting-requests. Bad

(RADIATOR) Bad authenticator in reply

2000-01-29 Thread Steve Suehring
Hello- I'm seeing tons of these messages: Sat Jan 29 13:43:29 2000: WARNING: Bad authenticator received in reply to ID 58 Ok, normally you'd say that I would need to add IgnoreAcctSignature. But these are coming from another Radius server from an AuthBy RADIUS portion of a Realm. If I add

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator in reply

2000-01-29 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Steve - On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Steve Suehring wrote: Hello- I'm seeing tons of these messages: Sat Jan 29 13:43:29 2000: WARNING: Bad authenticator received in reply to ID 58 Ok, normally you'd say that I would need to add IgnoreAcctSignature. But these are coming from another

(RADIATOR) Bad Authenticator

1999-10-05 Thread David Lloyd
What does it mean to have a bad authenticator in a request? My secrets match up okay, but I"m getting spammed with these. Thanks... === David M. Lloyd mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrator Internet Express, Inc. 802 W.

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad Authenticator

1999-10-05 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello David - On Tue, 05 Oct 1999, David Lloyd wrote: What does it mean to have a bad authenticator in a request? My secrets match up okay, but I"m getting spammed with these. It could be problems with non-conforming Accounting packets. You can set IgnoreAcctSignature in the offending

(Fwd) (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator from USR Total Control

1999-07-18 Thread Mike McCauley
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hugh Irvine) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:56:28 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hugh Irvine) Subject: (RADIATOR) "Bad authenticator" from USR Total Control This probably needs the following line added to the Client 206.

(RADIATOR) Bad authenticator ?

1999-05-11 Thread tom
Hi all, What does the following error/warning means? I have been getting these every minute. And only from the server 208.245.148.31 Tue May 11 18:28:11 1999: WARNING: Bad authenticator in request from DEFAULT (208.245.148.31) Thanks, Tom === To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator ?

1999-05-11 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Tom, On May 11, 5:43pm, tom wrote: Subject: (RADIATOR) Bad authenticator ? Hi all, What does the following error/warning means? I have been getting these every minute. And only from the server 208.245.148.31 Tue May 11 18:28:11 1999: WARNING: Bad authenticator in request from

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad Authenticator

1999-03-02 Thread Mike McCauley
is travelling right now, and there may be delays in our correspondence. -Original Message- From: Richard Hawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 7:10 AM Subject: (RADIATOR) Bad Authenticator Mon Mar 1 13:38:47 1999: WARNING: Bad authenticator