; just as vital to admit that things are not certain and
>
> evidence still is missing,
>
>
> In other words, I think we are on the same page.
>
>
> Best wishes
>
> Billy R.
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------
> *From:*
oups.com
Subject: Re: [RC] Re: Objectivity [ RC ] Is Science a Social Construct?
Hi Billy,
Well said. I think we are aligned around “the pursuit of objectivity” as a
goal; my main quibble is with those who claim to have “achieved objectivity.”
E
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 8, 2018, at 19:29, Dr.B.
;>
>>
>> From: Dr.B. Karthik Navayan <nava...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 10:21 AM
>> To: RadicalCentrism@googlegroups.com
>> Cc: Centroids; Billy Rojas
>> Subject: Re: [RC] Re: Object
---
> *From:* Dr.B. Karthik Navayan <nava...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 8, 2018 10:21 AM
> *To:* RadicalCentrism@googlegroups.com
> *Cc:* Centroids; Billy Rojas
> *Subject:* Re: [RC] Re: Objectivity [ RC ] Is Science a Social Construct?
>
> Billy Rojas,
> I l
From: Dr.B. Karthik Navayan <nava...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 10:21 AM
To: RadicalCentrism@googlegroups.com
Cc: Centroids; Billy Rojas
Subject: Re: [RC] Re: Objectivity [ RC ] Is Science a Social Construct?
Billy Ro
Billy Rojas,
I liked this explanation of subjectivity. Can I post it to my blog? With
your name.
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, 11:43 pm Billy Rojas, <1billyro...@buglephilosophy.com>
wrote:
> *Ernie:*
>
> There isn't just one correct way to define "objectivity." However, there is
>
> no point in getting