Re: [RC] Re: Are Evangelicals or University Professors More Irrational?

2011-10-28 Thread BILROJ
 
Mike :
Terrific observation. Yeah, this is an important difference. 
Thank Ernie --our very own professional physicist--  for this.
But the rest of us are also pro-science : In the sense you  pointed out.
 
Thanks
Billy
 
-
 
 
10/28/2011 9:14:21 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]  
writes:

This  reminds me of Alex Berezow's recent article that took both Ds and
Rs to  task for holding anti-science positions, and further attacked Ds
for  spreading the false claim that they're the pro-science  party:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/story/2011-09-20/gop-democrats-sc
ience-evolution-vaccine/50482856/1

I  think there may be a post somewhere here that referenced it, but I
don't  remember.

Science is a huge point that differentiates a centrist for  our
traditional left-right ideologues in America.  Leftists and  rightists
use the odd method of cherry-picking facts to support their  arguments,
which is honestly barely different than writing out a paper by  typing
whatever odd thought comes to mind at that moment, and then  trolling
the internet looking for sources that validate that drivel.   It's a
ludicrously backward way of operating, and rarely leads to the  correct
answer.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community 

Google Group:  http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and  blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 

Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org


[RC] Re: Are Evangelicals or University Professors More Irrational?

2011-10-28 Thread Mike Gonzalez
Speaking of that, I recorded today.  After I trim it a bit, I'll
upload it for your response.

On Oct 28, 2:02 pm, "Dr. Ernie Prabhakar"
 wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Oct 28, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Mike Gonzalez wrote:
>
> > Science is a huge point that differentiates a centrist for our
> > traditional left-right ideologues in America.  Leftists and rightists
> > use the odd method of cherry-picking facts to support their arguments,
> > which is honestly barely different than writing out a paper by typing
> > whatever odd thought comes to mind at that moment, and then trolling
> > the internet looking for sources that validate that drivel.  It's a
> > ludicrously backward way of operating, and rarely leads to the correct
> > answer.
>
> That's an excellent point: Radical Centrism is about applying the scientific 
> method to politics.
>
> If we could express that in two words, it'd be the perfect Podcast title. :-)
>
> E

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 

Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org


Re: [RC] Re: Are Evangelicals or University Professors More Irrational?

2011-10-28 Thread Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
Hi Mike,

On Oct 28, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Mike Gonzalez wrote:
> Science is a huge point that differentiates a centrist for our
> traditional left-right ideologues in America.  Leftists and rightists
> use the odd method of cherry-picking facts to support their arguments,
> which is honestly barely different than writing out a paper by typing
> whatever odd thought comes to mind at that moment, and then trolling
> the internet looking for sources that validate that drivel.  It's a
> ludicrously backward way of operating, and rarely leads to the correct
> answer.


That's an excellent point: Radical Centrism is about applying the scientific 
method to politics.

If we could express that in two words, it'd be the perfect Podcast title. :-)

E

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 

Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org


[RC] Re: Are Evangelicals or University Professors More Irrational?

2011-10-28 Thread Mike Gonzalez
This reminds me of Alex Berezow's recent article that took both Ds and
Rs to task for holding anti-science positions, and further attacked Ds
for spreading the false claim that they're the pro-science party:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/story/2011-09-20/gop-democrats-science-evolution-vaccine/50482856/1

I think there may be a post somewhere here that referenced it, but I
don't remember.

Science is a huge point that differentiates a centrist for our
traditional left-right ideologues in America.  Leftists and rightists
use the odd method of cherry-picking facts to support their arguments,
which is honestly barely different than writing out a paper by typing
whatever odd thought comes to mind at that moment, and then trolling
the internet looking for sources that validate that drivel.  It's a
ludicrously backward way of operating, and rarely leads to the correct
answer.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 

Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org