> Thanks for the sanity check, Jeremy - I'll have to investigate further.
I've seen the problem too. Then I ran aaa_create_tables.rb by hand,
then it all passed. Please do investigate and see if you can make it
work the first time without this manual step. Thanks!
--
David Heinemeier Hansson
http:
Yes, you are right. Sorry for the noise.
Kent.
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 14:51, Sam Stephenson wrote:
> Kent,
>
> Only version.rb is required for each framework. See
> Rails::Info#component_version (railties/lib/rails_info.rb, line 28).
>
> --
> sam
> _
Thanks for the sanity check, Jeremy - I'll have to investigate further.
On 12/13/05, Jeremy Hopple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 0 failures and 0 errors with MySQL on trunk.
>
> On 12/13/05, Ben Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi,
> > Spent a few minutes on the irc... lots of discuss
I have 0 failures and 0 errors with MySQL on trunk.
On 12/13/05, Ben Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
> Spent a few minutes on the irc... lots of discussion there - is there
> a dev irc? Anyways, here's what I was asking:
>
> Is anyone else having the problems I put in the subject. I'm
hi,
Spent a few minutes on the irc... lots of discussion there - is there
a dev irc? Anyways, here's what I was asking:
Is anyone else having the problems I put in the subject. I'm thinking
about switching to a more stable version of rails (assuming I don't
have something screwed up). Would thi
from the readme in the root of the zipped rails1.0 download:
i guess the "Congratulations, you've put Ruby on Rails!" should be
changed to something like: " Welcome aboard You’re riding the Rails! "
"
== Getting started
1. Run the WEBrick servlet: ruby script/server (run with --help
for op
* Michael Schoen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051212 14:15]:
> Can you try modifying oci_adapter.rb, and change OCIAdapter#active? to
> use @connection.active? instead of @connection.ping. The
> OCI8AutoRecover#active? method doesn't hit the db at all, it just
> returns the last known state. This will b
Yeah that is how I had to find out!
here i was anciously awaiting some anouncement on any of the ruby
related list, but NO, i had to find out from the website...
(I do very much like the new website layout though)
thanks David and all the other core guys for making 1.0 happen - i'm
looking fo
Looks very nice! and .. very 37Signals ;)
On 12/13/05, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/14/05, Francois Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> seams Rails 0.1.0 has been released? I was expecting a big todo? did i> miss a release anouncement or something?We have a new webpage, is tha
On 12/14/05, Francois Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> seams Rails 0.1.0 has been released? I was expecting a big todo? did i
> miss a release anouncement or something?
We have a new webpage, is that enough? ;)
http://www.rubyonrails.com/
--
Cheers
Koz
___
seams Rails 0.1.0 has been released? I was expecting a big todo? did i
miss a release anouncement or something?
___
Rails-core mailing list
Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
there is some seriously black art happening here:
i added the following code to callbacks.rb
def self.append_features(base) #:nodoc:
super
$i ||= 0
p $i
p caller.last
$i += 1
...
...
...
and then fired up ./script/console. this is what it prints:
harp:~/ror/bu
Kent,
On 12/13/05, Kent Sibilev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I won't help. The thing is that Rails::Initializer requires ruby_info.rb.
> ruby_info.rb is written in a way that as soon as you require it, it will load
> all frameworks. So even by not using gems at all, this config paramet
Jeremy,
I won't help. The thing is that Rails::Initializer requires ruby_info.rb.
ruby_info.rb is written in a way that as soon as you require it, it will load
all frameworks. So even by not using gems at all, this config parameter still
doesn't work as advertised.
Kent.
On Tuesday 13 Decemb
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Jeremy Kemper wrote:
I'd like a Module#wrap_method in Active Support to DRY up the repetitive,
error-prone aliasing and give us a single place to more thoroughly check for
double-wrapping.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat a.rb
require "tsort"
class TSortHash < ::Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
this kind of thing exists in other places in the code as well.
here are
summaries of the two stack traces when this code is loaded:
[...]
yikes. basically what is happening is that Callbacks gets
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Jeremy Kemper wrote:
I'd like a Module#wrap_method in Active Support to DRY up the repetitive,
error-prone aliasing and give us a single place to more thoroughly check for
double-wrapping.
sounds easy(ish) - i think you could setup a dependancy graph using a hash
full of
* Ara.T.Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051213 12:45]:
> now, why this seems to be platform dependant i do not understand yet -
> but the combination of autoloading hooks, require overrides, and
> non-protected (unless defined?...) class defs and method aliases seem
> fragile.
The only thought I have
My thoughts for implementation are something like this (I guess it
only covers the before case, but it should communicate the idea):
module ActionView
class Base
alias_method :old_render_file, :render_file
def render_file(template_path, use_full_path = true, local_assigns = {})
if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 12, 2005, at 11:21 PM, Kent Sibilev wrote:
Can I ask you guys what is the point of having config.frameworks in
environment.rb? According to the comment before this config
parameter, it is
there so you can specify which frameworks you don't w
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
i added some code to see how callbacks.rb was getting loaded and see that it's
gettting loaded twice. if you read the code and the way is uses alias_method
you will see that it is __very__ bad for this code the get loaded twice as it
sets up a recursiv
On Dec 12, 2005, at 5:01 PM, Kyle Maxwell wrote:
Sounds pretty reasonable to me. Couple thoughts:
I know that the Globalize plugin uses template.en-US.rhtml,
template.es-MX.rhtml, etc. To me this is preferable to
en-US/template.rhtml. That would lead to a lot of extra folders lying
about.
22 matches
Mail list logo
