Martin- Take a look at this plugin that just came out. I think it does what you are looking for as far as wrapping actions and yielding to them. Even allows for a chain of such filters.http://roman2k.free.fr/rails/meantime_filter/0.1.0/rdoc/-EzraOn Jul 2, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Martin Emde wrote:Well, i
Well, if you use the new around filter that I'm proposing you won't have a "before action" and "after action" you'll just have one method that yields the perform_action for the controller. This way it's unavoidable (without an exception being raised) for the code not to be run.
For example you wou
On 2-jul-2006, at 22:49, Andrew Kaspick wrote:
I've definitely had a need for more improved around and after filters.
If an action is cached, any after or around filters will not execute
as processing is basically halted after the cached page is served.
The problem here is that there is no as
On 7/2/06, Josh Susser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 2, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Coda Hale wrote:
> This is not particularly friendly behavior, but the buck for this can
> be passed on to the SQL standard: if you want an order, specify an
> order. Otherwise, don't expect anything.
>
> Does this se
The way I want these filters to work is that every filter is a block that yields the next filter or action. That would mean that unless the action raises an exception, it should still go back thru all the filter methods after returning from each yield.. I'll try to make sure this is going to work,
This is another edition of Rails Core Weekly, affectionately known as
RCW. A much nicer pre-web 3.0 version is available from the following
url :
http://www.pinupgeek.com/articles/category/rails-core-weekly-news
We have an Atom/RSS feed available there as well.
Rails Core Weekly summarizes the
On Jul 2, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Coda Hale wrote:
This is not particularly friendly behavior, but the buck for this can
be passed on to the SQL standard: if you want an order, specify an
order. Otherwise, don't expect anything.
Does this seem like a valid tradeoff to everyone?
I think it's best t
I've definitely had a need for more improved around and after filters.
If an action is cached, any after or around filters will not execute
as processing is basically halted after the cached page is served.
It would be nice to have filters that are guaranteed to run regardless
of whatever happens
Not particularly friendly indeed, but you're right - if you want order, specify it. Like Ruby hashes, you never know what you're gonna get :)I don't know about Oracle, but in Postgres it's never smart to rely on 'default' ordering because when a complex query is altered or Postgres version chages,
Hello all,I've been working with the action_controller filter code lately and I've noticed a lot of code repetition anda lot of room for improvement without breaking existing filter usage. I plan on submitting a patch that would clean this all up and add a few additional features.
The main goal
On 7/2/06, Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 2, 2006, at 17:15 , Coda Hale wrote:
> Well, I'm working with MySQL, which returns records by order of
> primary key. (I think.) Does anyone know of any Rails-supported RDBMS
> which doesn't do this?
PostgreSQL follows the SQL-spe
Coda Hale wrote:
Well, I'm working with MySQL, which returns records by order of
primary key. (I think.) Does anyone know of any Rails-supported RDBMS
which doesn't do this?
Oracle doesn't.
___
Rails-core mailing list
Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org
On Jul 2, 2006, at 17:15 , Coda Hale wrote:
Well, I'm working with MySQL, which returns records by order of
primary key. (I think.) Does anyone know of any Rails-supported RDBMS
which doesn't do this?
PostgreSQL follows the SQL-spec in this case.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
__
On 7/1/06, Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 2, 2006, at 8:21 , Coda Hale wrote:
> If there is no
> existing :order option in the find itself, the ORDER BY clause begins
> with the primary key of the model being searched, which is the default
> SQL order.
I can't speak to the
14 matches
Mail list logo
