Oops wrong link :S
http://pastie.caboo.se/9255
___
Rails-core mailing list
Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
On 8/18/06, Keith Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could define a fake test, but then the test and assertion count will
be off.
A simple:
def default_test
end
In your abstract test case will prevent the failure, and while you
will see an extra test, there will be no assertion inflat
Today I abused ActiveRecord badly, but to no avail, alas. I tried to
make it accept a habtm association to a class that wasn't derived from
ActiveRecord::Base. I like to think that I got pretty far stubbing out
all kinds of methods in my almost-PORO, when I got bitten by an
unrelated bug[*].
But the difference here is that has_many is named explicitly. The
TestInjector (while cool, don't get me wrong) feels a bit like PFM to
save 3 lines in a setup method. It also encourages a 1 class to 1 test
case method of testing which I don't think always makes the most sense
(see
http://glu.tto
Rails does a great job of inferring a lot of things based on names, so
it seems like a good fit to me.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :assignments
end
From this class declaration, Rails infers that there is an Assignment
model that contains the foreign key user_id. Isn't this the
See ActiveRecordTestCase in active_record_unit.rb in actionpack. I
defined a test_truth so Test::Unit::TestCase doesn't complain. The
test count is slightly inflated, but if you care enough about not
having request, response and controller instance variables setup then
it's an option.
Adding a de
Not without even more magic. Test::Unit::TestCase has an inherited
method that tries to build a test suite from any test_* methods in the
subclass.
Executing this code:
require 'test/unit'
class FunctionalTest < Test::Unit::TestCase; end
Produces:
1) Failure:
default_test:2
No tests were sp
Is there a reason we don't just create a new subclass of
Test::Unit::TestCase called ControllerTest (or FunctionalTest) and
inheirit from that instead? We don't have to worry about the magic and
it's still backwards compatible.
--
Kevin Clark
http://glu.ttono.us
__
In that case, the plugin won't help you, but it won't hinder you
either.
Francois Beausoleil wrote:
Hello Keith,
2006/8/17, Keith Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Comments, questions, suggestions?
My tests are defined like this now:
# test/functional/admin_controller_t
On 16-aug-2006, at 22:27, Francois Beausoleil wrote:
Expected /Users/luke/Sandbox/projects/rails_plugin_repository/
config/../vendor/plugins/unobtrusive_javascript/lib/
unobtrusive_javascript.rb to define UnobtrusiveJavascript
Moreover, I get the following error in my test environment:
LoadE
10 matches
Mail list logo
