On Jul 26, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Ryan Lowe wrote:
Suggestion: how about printing something during the "rake" test run to
indicate you are using deprecated methods? After I update rails for a
project, the first thing I do is run "rake" to make sure nothing
broke. Some deprecation warnings here wou
On Apr 27, 2006, at 9:31 PM, Marcel Molina Jr. wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:02:00PM -0700, Michael Schoen wrote:
"marcel" has given AR/Oracle some love, but it's still unhappy...
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/4296
--
On Apr 26, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Tobias Lütke wrote:
I don't understand this blog post. The graph looks more then
healthy to me.
The graph doesn't mean much, really. It says that as the code LOC
(measured by whatever he's using to measure LOC) has increased, the
test LOC has increased in ro
On Feb 18, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Dae San Hwang wrote:
Thank you for the reply!
I especially liked your analogy of ID to memory address though I'm not
yet 100% convinced. Following are my reasonings behind the preference
for multiple integer column id's:
1. I tend to think URL as a part of the
On Feb 9, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Tom Ward wrote:
On 2/9/06, Tom Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any suggestions for a better keyword are welcome!
Talking to yourself, first sign of madness and all that, but instead
of hastests I propose 'tested', to indicate that the patch has unit
tests, and th
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:26:59PM -0500, Tobias Luetke wrote:
> > How's the trunk lately? is it safe to run off it?
>
> Afaik all the core team members use trunk for their production
> applications by way of svn:externals or similar. Its probably the most
> stable trunk you will find in any activ
