If your favourite ticket isn't on that list, please add the
needs_review keyword so we can have a look. If one of the core team
removes the keyword, don't take it personally.
If the keyword is removed by anonymous do we just assume it's a core
member?
_
The tickets currently 'highlighted' for extra review by the core team
are in the following report:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/report/19
If your favourite ticket isn't on that list, please add the
needs_review keyword so we can have a look. If one of the core team
removes the keyword, don't tak
Thnx, now I can include it in the tutorial...
Thomas Fuchs wrote:
Applied (with some refactoring).
-Thomas
Am 26.02.2006 um 21:31 schrieb Abdur-Rahman Advany:
Hi,
This patch: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3530 would be nice to
include...
greets,
Abdur-Rahman
Andreas Schwarz wrote:
Applied (with some refactoring).
-Thomas
Am 26.02.2006 um 21:31 schrieb Abdur-Rahman Advany:
Hi,
This patch: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3530 would be nice to
include...
greets,
Abdur-Rahman
Andreas Schwarz wrote:
Michael Koziarski schrieb:
Hey guys,
We're now beginning to fin
Anyone have comments on ticket 3935
(http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3935) ? I think it should be in
1.1.
It allows for a set_fixture_class method in unit tests so table
accessor methods still work if your model uses a set_table_name call.
So for example (and from the unit tests):
model:
class
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 08:13:39AM +1300, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> So, if you have any tickets which you think need to be addressed,
> please bring them up in this thread, or add a keyword of
> needs_review. We're pretty keen on pushing out a 1.1 release pretty
> soon, but we also want to get
Hi,
This patch: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3530 would be nice to
include...
greets,
Abdur-Rahman
Andreas Schwarz wrote:
Michael Koziarski schrieb:
Hey guys,
We're now beginning to finalise rails 1.1, and we need to make sure
that we don't miss any heinous bugs. While we'll all
> This is neither a bug nor very important, but
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3461 is trivial, useful and 100%
> backwards compatible, so I don't think there is any reason for not
> including it in 1.1.
Applied.
--
David Heinemeier Hansson
http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain
ht
Michael Koziarski schrieb:
> Hey guys,
>
> We're now beginning to finalise rails 1.1, and we need to make sure
> that we don't miss any heinous bugs. While we'll all be giving the
> list a once over, we're only human and we're likely to miss things.
This is neither a bug nor very important, but
