Am Freitag, den 27.01.2006, 18:11 -0500 schrieb Francois Beausoleil:
> 2006/1/27, Norman Timmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > validates_presence_of :email_address, :message => 'Give me an address!'
> > validates_format_of :email_address, :with => /[EMAIL PROTECTED],}/,
> > :message
Hi !
2006/1/27, Norman Timmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> validates_presence_of :email_address, :message => 'Give me an address!'
> validates_format_of :email_address, :with => /[EMAIL PROTECTED],}/,
> :message => 'Something's wrong with your address!'
In this specific case, could
Am Freitag, den 27.01.2006, 08:21 -0800 schrieb David Goodlad:
> Seconded!
>
> In fact, I think this would be an interesting project for me; unless
> someone else is working on this already (Norman?), I'd love to try my
> hand at it.
It was just an idea. Go ahead Dave!
--
Norman Timmler
http:/
On 1/27/06, Duane Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Norman Timmler wrote:
>
> > Today i came to point where nested validation could make my code more
> > DRY. My question is, if anything like this planed?
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > Maybe you only want to display diff
On Jan 27, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Norman Timmler wrote:
Today i came to point where nested validation could make my code more
DRY. My question is, if anything like this planed?
Example:
Maybe you only want to display different error messages if an
attribute
is blank or has the wrong format.
va
