@mmd-osm pushed 1 commit.
321daf20f148de51f22e014548958a51c40916b6 Lazy loading relation members
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6326/files/07b66a3e25e4e32316facc2ed4c9102dacc5f611..321daf20f148de51f22e014548958a51c40916b6
You are receiving this
### Description
This PR makes 2 changes to the Dockerfile:
1. Removes `ruby-bundler` as bundler has been installed as a default gem since
[ruby 2.6.0](https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/12/25/ruby-2-6-0-released/).
2. Removes `ruby-dev` because header files for compiling extensions are already
AntonKhorev left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6330)
This is not a question for a repository named openstreetmap-website, but you
can look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Software/Desktop
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreet
tomhughes left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6330)
We develop a web site and have no knowledge of any native applications.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/6330#issuecomment-3193955164
You are rec
Closed #6330 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/6330#event-19188925876
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
rai
maro-21 left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6310)
> actually my caveat about changeset comments (rather than changeset discussion
> comments) may not be true for much longer, hopefully.
What I meant in this thread was of course "changeset discussion comments", not
"changeset com
iuvi7 created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6330)
### Problem
OSM for Desktop
### Description
Hi!
I found it awesome to use OSM on my laptop, but seems i can not find any
version exists (yet?)
Thanks a lot
### Screenshots
_No response_
--
Reply to this email directly or
tomhughes left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6329)
I think it comes down to this:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/5c006452082bea037c31e82763d62ba152af/app/models/changeset.rb#L90
where the changeset is still considered open (and hence will accept
mmd-osm left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6329)
No, it doesn't really matter. https://en.osm.town/@foxy/115038247194395320
looked like a new issue, but it's not. I checked this a year ago already, but
forgot to create an issue here. It's more to document it's a known issue.
--
@mmd-osm commented on this pull request.
>get "/relation/:id" => "relations#show", :id => /\d+/, :as => :relation
+ get "/relation/:id/member" => "relation_members#show", :id => /\d+/, :as =>
:relation_member
make sense, fixed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https
@mmd-osm pushed 1 commit.
07b66a3e25e4e32316facc2ed4c9102dacc5f611 Lazy loading relation members
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6326/files/d29274129dbcdc492c401c0181f546acdc3d26df..07b66a3e25e4e32316facc2ed4c9102dacc5f611
You are receiving this
@tomhughes commented on this pull request.
>get "/relation/:id" => "relations#show", :id => /\d+/, :as => :relation
+ get "/relation/:id/member" => "relation_members#show", :id => /\d+/, :as =>
:relation_member
Should this (and the other route) be `/members` given that they load all
memb
@tomhughes commented on this pull request.
> @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ There are two built-in applications which communicate via
> the API, and therefore
* **iD** - the web-based editor
* **The website itself** - for the Notes functionality
+You need to register these applications with *one* of t
tomhughes left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6329)
Does it really matter? I assume there's supposed to be a limit of 1 and
your point is that they're managing to exceed it, but it's only really there to
keep things sensible so 10001 likely doesn't matter much.
--
Reply to
mmd-osm created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6329)
### URL
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146420172
### How to reproduce the issue?
There seems to be some issue with single object uploads where users manage to
create changesets with 10'001 changes. This is impacting a
louwers created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6328)
### URL
https://www.openstreetmap.org/login
### How to reproduce the issue?
Probably needs to have the width and height removed from the svg.
### Screenshot(s) or anything else?
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f80c
@mmd-osm pushed 1 commit.
7a6615635346f79dd2c32709b14e0cf2984c809c Lazy loading relation members
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6326/files/370551de5bcf0fab1db0f1091f44a3c2784891b4..7a6615635346f79dd2c32709b14e0cf2984c809c
You are receiving this
17 matches
Mail list logo
