Since no one's replied, I've thought of a few specific questions
related to the code.
On 2/7/06, Kevin Old <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> function setMake() {
> var make = document.getElementById("make");
> var makere = /ford/;
>
> // Set the make
> for (var i=make.options.length-1;
On 2/7/06, Jerod Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Todd, you're correct; the first definition isn't supposed to be there :).
Thanks for the confirmation.
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3764
___
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyo
Todd, you're correct; the first definition isn't supposed to be there :).-JerodOn 2/7/06, Todd Ross <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Does the duplicate clone method of Position serve a subtle purpose
that I don't understand? I feel kind of foolish even asking, but ...I just don't get it. I've been look
Does the duplicate clone method of Position serve a subtle purpose
that I don't understand? I feel kind of foolish even asking, but ...
I just don't get it. I've been looking at this for a couple days now
and as far as I can tell, the first definition is useless as it gets
overlaid by the second
I'm working on a legacy product and introducing prototype to make my
life a little easier and I'm running into some problems with the
properties being added to some built in objects like Array.
The product has a form validator that's used all over that adds fields
(and some of the fields propertie
Hello everyone,
I have a page that populates/updates make, model and year select lists
via Ajax.Updater and I think that an EventObserver is causing a
conflict.
Here's what I'm trying to do. I'm using this page as a create and
edit page for a car database. If I'm calling the page in edit mode,
> bingo
>
> how come draggable.id worked without element in there?
>
No idea. Is draggable a reference to the draggable object or to the DOM
element being dragged? I didn't really look at your code; I just
figured you meant droppable.element.
___
Ra
bingo
how come draggable.id worked without element in there?
> Do you mean droppable.element.id?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:rails-spinoffs-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louis Walch
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:38 AM
>> To: rails-spinoffs@
Thanks Greg, I just figured that out after
looking at the auto complete class.
Jon Whitcraft
Indianapolis Motor Speedway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (317) 492-8623 :: Fax: (317) 492-6419
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
onComplete:
this.createArray.bindAsEventListener(this)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whitcraft, Jon
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006
12:30 PM
To: rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
Subject: [Rails-spinoffs] Question
about Classes.
I h
I have the attached class that I’m writing. The
problem that I’m running into is that I can not access the options from
the createArray function which get called after the ajax request gets done. I want to move the
values of the xml file to an array and story it in the options variable. C
Do you mean droppable.element.id?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:rails-spinoffs-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louis Walch
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:38 AM
> To: rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
> Subject: Re: [Rails-spinoffs] ajax.Updater w/ JS co
thanks, i misunderstood.
droppable.id in the function is coming through as "undefined" it does have
an id
>
> On 7 Feb 2006, at 17:47, Louis Walch wrote:
>
>> umm... if i remove the function name how does it know which
>> function to use?
>>
>>
>
> sorry, i meant remove ": function", or ra
On 7 Feb 2006, at 17:47, Louis Walch wrote:
umm... if i remove the function name how does it know which
function to use?
sorry, i meant remove ": function", or rather change it to:
function dropAction(...
Where are you defining the function? From what you've typed, it looks
like you'r
He is usually quite active on this list, though has been quite quiet recently. I know he's in London at the moment for the Future of Web Apps summit tommorrow, aside from that he has probably just been busy with Fluxion and other 'cool stuff', am sure he will return soon.
On 2/7/06, Peter Michaux <
Louis Walch wrote:
> umm... if i remove the function name how does it know which function to use?
That's not a function name, it's an attribute name. Unless your putting this
function definition in a classes prototype, then you're not really defining it.
it should be something like:
function d
umm... if i remove the function name how does it know which function to use?
>
> On 7 Feb 2006, at 17:35, Louis Walch wrote:
>
>> thanks for the help but you were right it should work - i just had
>> a typo :)
>>
>> next issue
>> tying to get it to hit a function onDrop, but its not w
On 7 Feb 2006, at 17:35, Louis Walch wrote:
thanks for the help but you were right it should work - i just had
a typo :)
next issue
tying to get it to hit a function onDrop, but its not working
correctly. i
was given this way of doing it last week on this board. when i load
t
thanks for the help but you were right it should work - i just had a typo :)
next issue
tying to get it to hit a function onDrop, but its not working correctly. i
was given this way of doing it last week on this board. when i load the
page w/ FF i get "dropAction is not defined"
dropA
Okay, I just hit version 0.8.3 and added a bunch, included a BSD based license (finally).http://thinkof.net/notify/index.htmlI have a question though, and this relates to the API of the library.In order for the script to degrade nicely (and play well with and tags) I needed a way to pass the targ
On 7 Feb 2006, at 16:38, Louis Walch wrote:
thanks that worked...
another related question
im also writing Droppables.add with the Ajax.Updater. and the drop
area
was written when the page was originally loaded (not the
ajax.updater area
of the page). will it still be droppable?
S
thanks that worked...
another related question
im also writing Droppables.add with the Ajax.Updater. and the drop area
was written when the page was originally loaded (not the ajax.updater area
of the page). will it still be droppable?
when i run updater, it writes the dragable items, and th
Hi,
I've been doing a lot of rewriting of dragdrop.js. I've covered at
least eight open tickets, made multiple selection of draggables,
droppables can accept multiple items at a time, added 21
consistently-named callbacks and have reorganized the code. I'm
working on adding more things to Sortable
I've been doing a lot of rewriting of the dragdrop.js code. Maybe it
will be accepted or maybe I'll be the only one using it. But it is my
first project in JavaScript so a few JavaScript details are a little
fuzzy for me.
---
Also, be careful about the problem described here:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails-spinoffs/2005-December/
001615.html
(which crashes all but the latest firefox, I think). Also, if you
surround your script elements with you
might have to remove them or you'll get javascript s
HA!
At this point I don't see myself not using prototype... It's just
so nice. So no worries.
-Greg
On Feb 7, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Gregory Hill wrote:
I never did like the eval () statement in my code. But quite
frankly I had never heard of binding a variable to a function the w
Pass evalScripts: true in the options hash passed to Ajax.Updater.
tom
-
http://www.smallroomsoftware.com
On 7 Feb 2006, at 15:28, Louis Walch wrote:
using Ajax.Updater to update a section of a page with a also
want to
write some javascript into it (because im trying
using Ajax.Updater to update a section of a page with a also want to
write some javascript into it (because im trying to make each of the
draggable. but the are not being written. is this not
possible?
___
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lis
> I never did like the eval () statement in my code. But quite
> frankly I had never heard of binding a variable to a function the way
> Greg showed me either (thanks BTW).
Just a quick note on that; the bind() function is part of prototype.js.
It isn't a native javascript function. Just w
Ryan,
I think it was a combination of the evals, and the way I was using
Effects. I took the effects out by default, and I just turn the
layer on and off. I think it adds to the usability as the popup come
immediately, instead of waiting for a while to become visible.
I never did like t
Hey!!! Much better! Good job. So what was making it so slow before? The
evals?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
Militello
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:14 PM
To: rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
Subject: [Rails-spinoffs] Notify
31 matches
Mail list logo