>>Someone suggested using document.write to write a new script element. I
>>don't see how this helps because I am not aware of any way to write to a
>>completed page without overwriting the page. This appears to me to be
>>simply a page reload.
Wonder why you remember Martin's name and not min
Martin Bialasinski wrote:
should rather be
evalScriptsGlobal: function() {
return this.extractScripts().map(function(s){eval.call(window, s)});
},
Thanks to all who have supplied input on this.
To recap the problem that I would like to see a universal solution for:
(I think the OP w
Hello everyone,
I've taken this rating system
(http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/24/creating-a-star-rater-using-css/)
and paired it with Prototype (http://prototype.conio.net) so that it
reports the ratings via Ajax.
I have a working version here (ajax is disabled though):
http://kold
On Monday 17 April 2006 12:37, Gregory Hill wrote:
> Isn't the difference that the scriptaculous one only gets child nodes
> from the node you specify, whereas the prototype one gets all in the
> entire document?
the prototype one allows you to pass in an element to start with:
document.getElement
Is there any more news on this? I've built some functionality I need
around onComplete and have just come across this problem with IE.
Thanks,
Jamie
On Mar 8, 2006, at 5:51 AM, Pelle Braendgaard wrote:
I am having this same problem. I tried changing the encoding like
suggested and it did n
On 4/17/06, Gregory Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't the difference that the scriptaculous one only gets child nodes
> from the node you specify, whereas the prototype one gets all in the
> entire document?
Prototype's document.getElementsByClassName allows you to pass in the
parentElement
Isn't the difference that the scriptaculous one only gets child nodes
from the node you specify, whereas the prototype one gets all in the
entire document?
Still, it would be nice to just have the one, and let you pass in the
document element if you wanted all of them.
Just guessing, really. I h
Thanks for your help! I'll try to find another way..On 4/17/06, Daniel Elmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The autocompleter does not support
scrolling. Touching a scroll bar fires the onBlur event.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On Monday 17 April 2006 11:24, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> Is there a reason scriptaculous provides what appears to be a redundant
> function? The reason I'm asking is that it only seems to be used twice
> throughout all of scriptaculous, and it doesn't appear to work properly
> (for some reason it's
Is there a reason scriptaculous provides what appears to be a redundant
function? The reason I'm asking is that it only seems to be used twice
throughout all of scriptaculous, and it doesn't appear to work properly (for
some reason it's returning the actual element, rather than an array with al
The autocompleter does not support
scrolling. Touching a scroll bar fires the onBlur event.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Fitzhenry
Sent: Monday, April
17, 2006 1:01 PM
To: Rail Spinoffs
Subject: [Rails-sp
Anyone run into the problem where the autocomplete results div disappears when you click or click/drag on the scroll bars for the div?-- David Fitzhenry -
http://fitzhenrys.blogspot.comhttp://www.gone2far.com
___
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs
I have some ideas how to go about this, but wanted to see if people
already had solutions in place for this.
The basic scenario is i'm sending form data over ajax using
form.serialize to send the form data (as per the standard methodology).
However, on some pages i have very large forms (few th
Here you go:
Very Basic Example (save them to your desktop and fire ajax_updator.html.
Please make sure prototype.js is also present there):
You may find errors and can suggest 100 other approaches, but this should be
enough to demonstrate how evalScripts works.
-Mandy.
Title: AJAX Usage

> What's the problem with the code? How should I write it?
I was referring to Todd's example. He purposely added an extraneous
comma at the end of his list that is invalid syntax in IE. I was just
explaining what Martin had meant, not about the original issue about
evalScripts. I haven't really
> The problem there is that your javascript code is invalid in IE.
What's the problem with the code? How should I write it?
Can someone who has evalScripts working in IE show me a snippet of the
return code.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem there is that your javascript code is invalid in IE. So,
the eval cannot finish executing the code.. However, errors thrown
during an eval do not get sent to the javascript error dialog (at least,
from what I've seen). So, you don't see the error on the page.
What Martin was saying
17 matches
Mail list logo
