Looks like that ticket is languishing -- maybe the owner can create a
patch, unit test(s) and tag it with the right keywords?
On 6/4/06, Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/3/06, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems that you could just do:
>
> var camelizedString = oSt
Will Merrell wrote:
> Am I missing something? Is there some way to have this test file support
> the dropping we are talking about?
Here's the full code that worked well for me.
cheers
Ingmar
new document
ul {
min-he
Garito wrote:
I would like to have a Ajax class that replace instead of update a
container
Your class has way too much copy and paste from prototype. The
Ajax.Updater takes an Insertion object as an option. There is not a
replacement insertion object but you could easily wrap Element.replace.
Hi!
In my opinion prototype.js is a good library. With it I learn more
javascript than in my whole life but I need to create another class to
work like I prefer
I would like to have a Ajax class that replace instead of update a container
Why?
I love something like this:
Element1
On 6/3/06, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems that you could just do:
var camelizedString = oStringList[0];
and achieve the same thing. Am I missing something?
No. http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4170
Bye,
Martin
___
Rails-spinoffs m
On 6/3/06, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also both functions allow the second parameter to be a function
(although with different arguments).
Not in Internet Explorer 5. This is the sole reason why this function exists.
Bye,
Martin
___
R
