I think dojo has aop features (which are apparently very well done),
via its event system (that's what it is called). you can register pre
& post funcitons for arbitrary functions. This may be a good place to
look, it may be easier to port it from dojo than recreate from
scratch.
FYI, I dont thin
Hey all,
This is just a little heads up about a little script I have been using
a bit & thought I'd put it out there (hopefully someone adds some
other stuff so I dont have to do it all).
Basically it works very similar to Element.extend (snarfed some of the
code), but you can define functions p
jSON vs Component:
It depends on what you want to do with the generated grid. If you need
to munge the data to put it into a grid (i.e. dates, timespan) for
display purposes, it is sometimes handy to have the raw json object
around so that you dont have to do a whole lot of un-munging in JS to
ge
The easiest is probably clear the containers contents in the onSuccess
handler. This gets called just before the container gets updated.
Nick
On 6/1/06, Garito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all!
How can I do a Ajax.Replacer instead of Ajax.Updater?
I created Ajax.Replacer but I would like to i
And yes, it fixed the memory problems I was having. (ie still leaks a
little, but not much)
On 5/12/06, nick hemsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I checked it out from svn yesterday. bit of a pain as it needs rake to
build the prototype.js file. if anyone wants it, let me know.
On 5
ritten much before that?
If not, then this might still not address the problems.
Thoughts?
-Mandy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of nick hemsley
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:24 AM
To: rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
Subject: Re:
OK, scrap this, check out the latest in svn. this issue got raised in trac: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4465On 5/11/06,
nick hemsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Disclaimer: Im still getting used to dynamic scoping. & _javascript_ as well.Which part clobbers window.property? If thi
Todd Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/06, nick hemsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> for (property in methods) {for (var property in methods) {ensures that you're working with a locally-scoped property variable.
The way it's written, if window.property ex
Slightly nicer:Element.extend = function(element) { if (!element) return; if (!element._extendedMethods) element._extendedMethods = {} if (!element._extended && element.tagName && element != window) {
var methods = Element.Methods; for (property in methods) { if (typeof methods[pro
If anyone can come up with a better alternative to the line:args = $A([this]).zip($A(arguments)).flatten();i.e. without needing to use flatten, let me know.
On 5/9/06, nick hemsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Turns out this is causing (at least some) of the problems I have been having with IE bl
Turns out this is causing (at least some) of the problems I have been having with IE bloating.The culprit as far as I can tell is the bind call (anon function & dom element, not too sure why this is a circular reference though) in
Element.extend. I have been having a poke around, but I can't think
11 matches
Mail list logo
