Re: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-07-08 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
Martinez, Andrew wrote: > How aboutnot reviving week old posts. > > Just let them go Jeremy, just let them go. sorry, just been a bit behind reading this mailing list and playing catch-up, that's all ;) -Jeremy signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

RE: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-07-06 Thread Martinez, Andrew
: RE: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression Jeremy on fire! :)) ___ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs ___ Rails-spinoffs

RE: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-07-06 Thread Maninder, Singh
Jeremy on fire! :)) ___ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-07-06 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Monday 26 June 2006 07:40, Sam wrote: > Can JavaScript files be gzip'ed in advance, stored on a server and > delivered reliably to all browsers? Any browser exceptions? apache's mod_gzip allows this functionality. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pirate-party.us/ -

RE: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-26 Thread Maninder, Singh
Title: Message Yes, _javascript_ files can be gzip'd in advance, stored on a server and delivered to browsers.   However, IE still has a bug (it's not to do with gzipping the content, it's to do with delivering the content where the data transfer terminates abruptly).   Here you go with the

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-26 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Yes definitely. Don't know if prototype is going to be part of the ajax alliance thing but people are starting to do "hosting" of js packages as well, thus enabling more opportunities/likelyhood that the js being served has already been cached. It's probably poor manners to being percieved as prom

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-26 Thread Thomas Fuchs
IMHO, the important thing about serving _javascript_ is getting the caching right (that is do content expiration in a away that the browser won't ask the server if the _javascript_ was updated for a certain period of time). For repeated page views on a site or web app, that's the most important per

RE: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-26 Thread Sam
Title: Message Can _javascript_ files be gzip'ed in advance, stored on a server and delivered reliably to all browsers?  Any browser exceptions?   Sam     ___ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.o

RE: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-25 Thread Maninder, Singh
I don't say that dojo compression is not good, but try debugging in compressed mode on production where your code is deployed, it's just impossible.   Then go through the pain of maintaining a development version of the file and a production version of the file!   It's really not worth com

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I would disagree with point #2 below. It has been researched(and theoretically proven? don't remember the details anymore..google search would probably turn it up) already that gzip ~may~ not always be as fast for deployment as people seem to think. As for tool reliability, not sure I understand th

RE: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-25 Thread Maninder, Singh
I'd like to add 2 things here -   (1) Dojo also provides an online tool for the same (for those of you who don't want to go through the hassle of setting up anything :) It's called SHRINKSAFE: http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/shrinksafe/   (2) As far as gzip is concerned, that's what I would adv

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-25 Thread Siegfried Puchbauer
I use mod_deflate in my apache httpd to compress the js files. Nearly every modern browser supports contenttype gzip and you get a reduction from about 60 to 80% of the source files. One of the benefits is that you can compress any content (html, css, js ...)... Formerly i also tried js source comp

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-25 Thread Peter Michaux
On 6/25/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is Java-based, so should run on windows without a problem. It isn't a > polished GUI at the moment, you'll need to do a bit of scripting to get it before compression it is a good idea to make sure your code passes the test at http://www.jslint.co

RE: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-25 Thread Sam
> It is Java-based, so should run on windows without a problem. It isn't a > polished GUI at the moment, you'll need to do a bit of scripting to get it > set up. More details here: > http://dojotoolkit.org/docs/compressor_system.html Here's a batch file I used to compress all my JavaScripts...

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-25 Thread Dirk Eschler
Am Sonntag, 25. Juni 2006 16:19 schrieb Sam: > Is there a good windows-based JavaScript compressor which will reliably > compress script aculo and prototype? > > Sam I've used jsmin with no problems. Haven't tried it on Windows though. http://javascript.crockford.com/jsmin.html -- Dirk Eschler

RE: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-25 Thread Sam
http://dojotoolkit.org/docs/compressor_system.html Sounds promising. I'll see if I can survive the setup ! ;-) Sam ___ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] JavaScript Compression

2006-06-25 Thread Dave Crane
Hi Sam, I used the compressor that ships with Dojo on a biggish codebase that uses prototype and scriptaculous, and it worked. Knocked 500K of code down to 340K if I remember right, but your mileage may vary. It is Java-based, so should run on windows without a problem. It isn't a polished GUI