I tested both Linux source and binary and they worked fine.
Thanks,
-Manjula.
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 18:41 +0530, Uthaiyashankar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have packed and uploaded Apache Rampart/C 1.3.0 RC1 here [1]. Please test
> it with Apache Axis2/C 1.6.0 here [2], and send your feedback.
>
> Rega
We are pleased to announce the release of Apache Axis2/C version 1.6.0.
You can download this release from
http://ws.apache.org/axis2/c/download.cgi
Key Features
1. Support for one-way messaging (In-Only) and
request response messaging (In-Out)
2. Client APIs : Easy t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manjula Peiris resolved RAMPARTC-133.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Current
Fixed in revision 760338
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manjula Peiris reassigned RAMPARTC-133:
---
Assignee: Manjula Peiris (was: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge)
> Thumbpr
Versions: Current
Reporter: Manjula Peiris
Assignee: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge
When in X509Token Ramaprt sends an empty
KeyInfo for Signature token.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
+1.
-Manjula.
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 10:05 +0530, Uthaiyashankar wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
>
> > Yes completely +1. This should be 1.3 right?
>
>
>
> Yes, It should be 1.3
>
> Regards,
> Shankar
>
>
> >
> >
> > Supun
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12666225#action_12666225
]
Manjula Peiris commented on RAMPARTC-131:
-
Can't send the backtrac
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:30 -0800, Vivian Wang wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> But my question is really this: In WS-Policy, what parameters need to be or
> can be configured for incoming message (the response message from a client
> point of view)? I don't see much document in rampart/c site. From a use
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 22:06 -0700, Raymond Zhou wrote:
> Hi, Uthaiyashankar,
>
> Thanks much for the info. I am a bit surprised that we can only set
> the few parameters programmably. I don't think it's ideal for client
> users to set up so many parameters in a complicated xml file in a file
> sy
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.5.0
Reporter: Manjula Peiris
Assignee: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge
We set the propert is_server_side in the msg_ctx. For the dual channel scenario
in the client side there is a separate listener. So the client incoming path is
httpd segfaults for WSSeconvSign scenarios
--
Key: RAMPARTC-125
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-125
Project: Rampart/C
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Manjula Peiris
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manjula Peiris resolved RAMPARTC-109.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Manjula Peiris (was: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 04:15 -0700, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:51 AM, Manjula Peiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:44 +0530, Kaushalye Kapuruge wrote:
> > > Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:44 +0530, Kaushalye Kapuruge wrote:
> Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > At the moment a Rampart/C service can handle single client for signed
> > messages. This is because of the static configuration of the certificate
> > files. Now Rampart/C supports the PK
ula for this finding.
> > Is this a bug or added purposely?
> > Are there any problems if module defined phases get invoked before the
> > default phases?
> > If not definitely need to fix this phase ordering problem in Axis2/C.
> > Cheers,
> > Kaushalye
> &g
module defined phases after invoking its default phases. I
think we need to fix this. I will raise a JIRA.
Thanks,
-Manjula.
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:18 +0530, Manjula Peiris wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:15 +0530, Manjula Peiris wrote:
> > Shankar,
> >
> > I have te
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:15 +0530, Manjula Peiris wrote:
> Shankar,
>
> I have tested Rampart/C with a soap action(without addressing) and
> putting the Security phase even before Transport phase and it worked. So
> I think what is happening in this case is that actual dispatc
Shankar,
I have tested Rampart/C with a soap action(without addressing) and
putting the Security phase even before Transport phase and it worked. So
I think what is happening in this case is that actual dispatching does
not happen from soap action phase dispatcher.
-Manjula.
On Wed, 2008-05-2
With openssl_pkey what you are doing may be correct. I was talking about
the general case regarding refs.
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 13:43 +0530, Manjula Peiris wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 12:05 +0530, Uthaiyashankar wrote:
> > Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 12:05 +0530, Uthaiyashankar wrote:
> Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We use a ref count to keep track of the references to a openssl_pkey_t and
> > use it in the openssl_pkey_free method. In the openssl_pkey_create method we
> > are setting the ref count to 0. But
+1.
Thanks.
-Manjula.
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:34 +0600, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> +1.
>
> Samisa...
>
> Milinda Pathirage wrote:
> > Here's my +1.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Milinda
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi list,
+1.
Thanks,
-Manjula
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:34 +0600, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> +1.
>
> Samisa...
>
> Milinda Pathirage wrote:
> > Here's my +1.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Milinda
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Manjula Peiris <[
Supun,
I think it is better if you carry on this vote in Axis2/C list. Then
other commiters will start voting.
Thanks,
-Manjula.
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 10:07 +0530, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I would like to propose Prasad Perera as an Apache Rampart/C committer.
>
> He has contr
There is a function called,
AXIS2_EXTERN axis2_char_t *AXIS2_CALL
openssl_x509_get_cert_data(const axutil_env_t *env,
X509 *cert)
which returns the delimiter removed string. But it takes X509 pointer
which is defined in openssl. So i think Chinthana's patch will be
usef
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manjula Peiris resolved RAMPARTC-85.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Manjula Peiris (was: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manjula Peiris resolved RAMPARTC-86.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Manjula Peiris (was: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge)
Fixed
Reporter: Manjula Peiris
Assignee: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 1.2.0
For an example in rampart_util when it fails to load the callback it writes it
as an info evnthough it is an error.
--
This message is automatically
Rampart always send SOAP 1.2 faults.
Key: RAMPARTC-87
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-87
Project: Rampart/C
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.1.0
Reporter: Manjula
/browse/RAMPARTC-86
Project: Rampart/C
Issue Type: Bug
Components: OMXMLSecurity
Affects Versions: 1.1.0
Reporter: Manjula Peiris
Assignee: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.2.0
This is in
: build system (UNIX)
Affects Versions: 1.1.0
Reporter: Manjula Peiris
Assignee: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.2.0
Rampart_error_codes_t enum is typedef before defining. This cause some parts of
rampart (eg: sct_provider
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Current
Reporter: Manjula Peiris
Assignee: Malinda Kaushalye Kapuruge
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 1.2.0
When we attach policies in operation's message direction lable (in
services.xml), Rampart/c does not s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12573593#action_12573593
]
Manjula Peiris commented on RAMPARTC-76:
Currently Neethi/C security po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12573590#action_12573590
]
Manjula Peiris commented on RAMPARTC-71:
Yes Uthiyashankar is right. Your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572804#action_12572804
]
Manjula Peiris commented on RAMPARTC-71:
If you engage addressing you don&#x
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 21:10 -0800, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Rampart cannot be configured in a request basis. So we cannot use
> Rampart for one set of requests and do not use it for another set of
> requests.
>
> Rampart uses policy to decide what to build and process security
>
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 12:43 +0530, Milinda Pathirage wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After doing some research with openssl pkcs12 implementation, I designed
> following API for PKCS12 Keystore to include in Rampart/C.
>
> Currently Rampart configuration support specifying certificate using their
> .pem fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPARTC-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12562339#action_12562339
]
Manjula Peiris commented on RAMPARTC-56:
I think if we add a separate metho
Hi Sankar,
When keeping the BootstrapPolicy I think it is good to store it as a
(neethi_policy_t *) inside SecureConversationToken. Do you have any
different plans ?
-Thnaks,
Manjula.
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 10:10 +0530, Uthaiyashankar wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> We are implementing WS-SecureConvers
> [1] http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/sed.htm
>
>
> Manjula Peiris wrote:
> > Actually we do not put file locations relevant to Linux in Rampart
> > Secpolicy files. What we do is we put the place where the secpolicy file
> > should be copied relative to
Hi,
I have tested source distribution on Linux. Works fine .
Here is my +1.
-Manjula.
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 16:20 +0530, Dushshantha Chandradasa wrote:
> Hi,
> I have tested the source and binary packages on Windows XP. Works fine with
> axis2c svn head.
> Although I found a 0 byte patch file
Reporter: Manjula Peiris
Assignee: Davanum Srinivas
Rampart with signature and encryption enabled does not work with mtom.
With encryption it does not send the attachment to the server.
With Signature it seg faults with the following back trace.
#0 0xb7a4027b in c14n_normalize_text
41 matches
Mail list logo
