Re: [rancid] Fortiweb 400C 5.82

Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:16:52PM -0500, Gerhard Mourani: > Connection to the FortiWeb doesn’t complete and make a timeout. In the past, > It was related to password prompt that has been changed by Fortinet on this > model. Here past discussion on the subject -> > https://lists.gt.net/rancid/users

Re: [rancid] Fortiweb 400C 5.82

Connection to the FortiWeb doesn’t complete and make a timeout. In the past, It was related to password prompt that has been changed by Fortinet on this model. Here past discussion on the subject -> https://lists.gt.net/rancid/users/9793 Regards, > On F

Re: [rancid] Fortiweb 400C 5.82

Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 09:19:10AM -0500, Gerhard Mourani: > Hello, > > I've a problem again backing up Fortiweb configuration. > Rancid 3.7 > FortiWeb-400C 5.82,build1375,170622 and the problem is? ___ Rancid-discuss mailing list Rancid-discuss@shrubbery

Re: [rancid] OTP/2-factor authentication

Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:34:32PM +, Wayne Eisenberg: > I did some searching, and I'm pretty sure I already know the answer, but has > anyone had any success with rancid and 2-factor authentication such as OKTA > (time-based OTP)? > > Any workarounds? how would it work? I'm probably being de

[rancid] OTP/2-factor authentication

I did some searching, and I'm pretty sure I already know the answer, but has anyone had any success with rancid and 2-factor authentication such as OKTA (time-based OTP)? Any workarounds? Thanks, Wayne The information in this Internet e-mail (and any attachmen

Re: [rancid] Making variant of cisco ios

Doug, could you elaborate on what you meant by "modify ProcessHistory accordingly"? I feel like I'm missing some basic concept here. (I've added the command I want to my custom cisco-ace type definition, and modified router.db to reference the cisco-ace type, but the new command output isn't s

Re: [rancid] Making variant of cisco ios

Cisco stuff is so full of conditions and exceptions that sometimes it helps to look outside that ecosystem-of-bloat (not the fault of Rancid, fwiw). That said, ShowCellular is pretty simple. You could eliminate the PDP and DNS lines for certain. outside of ios.pm, hrancid has some nice svelte ones

Re: [rancid] Show tech on latest Procurve software

On 2/20/2018 1:10 PM, heasley wrote: > Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:46:21AM +0100, Aleksander Vines: >> That worked perfectly. Thanks for the fast reply. >> >> >> For reference, if anyone else have issues with new procurve software, this >> is what I added: >> >> >> >> # This routine parses "show tec

Re: [rancid] Show tech on latest Procurve software

Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:46:21AM +0100, Aleksander Vines: > That worked perfectly. Thanks for the fast reply. > > > For reference, if anyone else have issues with new procurve software, this is > what I added: > > > > # This routine parses "show tech transceivers" > sub ShowTechTransceivers {

Re: [rancid] Making variant of cisco ios

Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:37:52PM +, Charles T. Brooks: > I have some old cisco ACE devices and have been backing them up with rancid > using the normal "cisco" module. > > I want to add some commands like "show ft group summary" for example, and > have the output of those commands show up in

[rancid] Making variant of cisco ios

I have some old cisco ACE devices and have been backing them up with rancid using the normal "cisco" module. I want to add some commands like "show ft group summary" for example, and have the output of those commands show up in rancid diffs, prefixed with exclamation points in the same way that

Re: [rancid] Show tech on latest Procurve software

Thank you for sharing! Sincerely, Vacheslav From: Rancid-discuss [mailto:rancid-discuss-boun...@shrubbery.net] On Behalf Of Aleksander Vines Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 11:46 AM To: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net Subject: Re: [rancid] Show tech on latest Procurve software >That worked

Re: [rancid] Show tech on latest Procurve software

That worked perfectly. Thanks for the fast reply. For reference, if anyone else have issues with new procurve software, this is what I added: # This routine parses "show tech transceivers" sub ShowTechTransceivers {     ...     while () {         ...         # These next two lines are new