Hi,
I was wondering about the intention of `mark-active [booted]`. Maybe I'm
misinterpreting the docs[0] though.
So here is the paragraph in question:
"Last but not least, after switching to a different slot by mistake,
this can be remedied by choosing booted as the argument which is, by the
Hello Ulrich,
Am Dienstag, den 05.12.2017, 10:14 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Ölmann:
> Hi Leif,
>
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:01:11AM +, Middelschulte, Leif wrote:
> > I was wondering about the intention of `mark-active [booted]`. Maybe I'm
> > misinterpreting the docs[0] tho
Hello Kevin,
verify that you pass the right kernel parameter via (in your case) uboot.
See
https://github.com/rauc/rauc/blob/48aa81da78737876e09010f77b635acda2c54145/src/context.c#L24
Also check the example on grub:
https://github.com/rauc/rauc/blob/master/docs/examples.rst#grub-configuration
Hello Abhishek,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.10.2018, 10:46 +0530 schrieb Abhishek Kumar Rai:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am facing one issue after doing following steps:
> 1. flashing any image in appfs.
> 2. rauc status mark-active rootfs.0.(Activated rootfs.0)
Is this update considered successful by rauc? What