On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:55:18AM +, Middelschulte, Leif wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 05.12.2017, 10:14 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Ölmann:
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:01:11AM +, Middelschulte, Leif wrote:
> > > I was wondering about the intention of `mark-active [booted]`. Maybe I'm
> > >
Hello Ulrich,
Am Dienstag, den 05.12.2017, 10:14 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Ölmann:
> Hi Leif,
>
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:01:11AM +, Middelschulte, Leif wrote:
> > I was wondering about the intention of `mark-active [booted]`. Maybe I'm
> > misinterpreting the docs[0] though.
> >
> > So here
Hi Leif,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:01:11AM +, Middelschulte, Leif wrote:
> I was wondering about the intention of `mark-active [booted]`. Maybe I'm
> misinterpreting the docs[0] though.
>
> So here is the paragraph in question:
> "Last but not least, after switching to a different slot by
Hi,
I was wondering about the intention of `mark-active [booted]`. Maybe I'm
misinterpreting the docs[0] though.
So here is the paragraph in question:
"Last but not least, after switching to a different slot by mistake,
this can be remedied by choosing booted as the argument which is, by the
