Hello,
On 01/03/2023 22:59, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
...
... The file tree and the data files' content is only
a part of a bootable ISO 9660 image. There's executable code in the
blind spots of such a view: MBR legacy BIOS boot code, EFI programs in
the EFI partition,
On 2023-03-01, John Gilmore wrote:
>>> So, overall, I actually don't think that diffoscope has the requested
>>> support, and it's not "just" a bug of failed identification.
>
> I have been surprised at how much effort has gone into "diffoscope" as a
> total fraction of the Reproducible Builds
>> So, overall, I actually don't think that diffoscope has the requested
>> support, and it's not "just" a bug of failed identification.
I have been surprised at how much effort has gone into "diffoscope" as a
total fraction of the Reproducible Builds effort. Perhaps it is a case
akin to the
Hello,
I noticed only now that I never answered to this question.
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:36:03AM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
> I'm therefore again looking for reproducible-builds-related
> flyers and stickers to distribute at the booth and hope this
> time I'm asking early enough.
>
> Does
Hi,
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I already knew that hybrid ISO 9660 are pretty much devil's offspring,
> and I guess I could have done without your introduction to them /o\
Since i am helping to create them i feel obligated to warn the public.
{:)
> FWIW, currently diffoscope _does_ have a iso9660
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 09:44:56PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> There are various layouts. Some are quite awkward and invite for getting
> lost in the woods. (Actually they lure firmwares out of the woods.)
Duh.
I already knew that hybrid ISO 9660 are pretty much devil's
Hi,
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> So, overall, I actually don't think that diffoscope has the requested
> support, and it's not "just" a bug of failed identification.
If it gets support for detecting partitions in image files then it will
have to handle hybrid bootable ISO 9660 images which bear
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your replay, please see my inline comments.
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Lamb
>Sent: 01 March 2023 16:26
>To: pyla venkata(ＴＳＩＰ TMIEC ODG Porting) tsip.com>; rb-general
>Subject: Re: Does diffoscope compares disk partitions
>
>Hey Venkata,
>
>> Does it support
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 10:55:41AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Does it support disk partitions or do I missing something?
>
> The short answer is that that diffoscope *should* support comparing your
> partition images properly, instead of falling back to a raw
> xxd(1) comparison. The reason
Hey Venkata,
> Does it support disk partitions or do I missing something?
The short answer is that that diffoscope *should* support comparing your
partition images properly, instead of falling back to a raw
xxd(1) comparison. The reason diffoscope doesn't do that right now is
either due to a
On 28.02.2023 04:15, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:11:16PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
It also contains forks of some autopkgtest code, last updated in 2017,
if I am reading the git logs correctly. It is apparently no longer
working with current versions of qemu with the
11 matches
Mail list logo
