Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. :)
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-04/
.. and also consider retweeting:
Hi all,
Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-04/?draft
… or, via the Git repository itself:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2024-04.md
I intend to publish it no
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-04/
.. and also consider retweeting:
Hey folks,
If you have a moment, please review the draft for the Reproducible
Builds report for April:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-04/?draft
You can do this via the Git repository itself, too:
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-04/
.. and also consider retweeting:
Hi all,
Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-04/?draft
… or, via the Git repository itself:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2022-04.md
I intend to publish it no
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-04/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please
Hi all,
Sorry about the short delay. Please review the draft for April's
Reproducible Builds report:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-04/?draft
… or, via the Git repository itself:
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-04/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please
Hello all
I have run over the reports 2020-04 only. It is an important topic in my mind, but yet I havn't enough time for details. Too much other things But I'm busy with C++ compilation for embedded platforms, where this is an important topic too.
Best regards from Hartmut
Chris Lamb
Hi all,
Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-04/?draft
… or, via the Git repository itself:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2020-04.md
I intend to publish it no
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-04/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please
On Thu, 02 May 2019 05:41:38 -0400, "Chris Lamb" wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
>
> https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-04/?draft
Looks good. As always, thanks for doing that!
--- David A. Wheeler
Hi all,
Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-04/?draft
… or, via the Git respository itself:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2019-04.md
I intend to publish it no
14 matches
Mail list logo
